IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] srv-09 comments

⌘ Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com> Tue, 17 February 2015 22:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mamille2@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411821A90E7 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:05:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SztedjWhduoh for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:05:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 678811A90E6 for <dane@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:05:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1697; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1424210739; x=1425420339; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ejFdFYUIuQXC8PQE7O4rgNGxaTdCOlQotULuseGwMV8=; b=BFOTiFX53fVops9c5zHHJc/ebQJsExkvvuHarUIV8lyEQkPfE+dCmY/u CL/DU0K0XuhZo9yAt2AHjQYHFhSgNMNY/Had3JzdF3mGrc5d4MOSDqag7 oHruSK1wa4KkXnfsmusLrmPXO7hj44tJd5EXk7bRB4Cly0xjLuSqOtYcd w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0B9BQD4ueNU/4gNJK1bgwZSWgSCf79HhXkCgRpDAQEBAQEBfIQNAQEEIw8BRQEQCQIOCgICBRYLAgIJAwIBAgE1EAYNAQUCAQGIK5xqnGyXcAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARMEgSGJboQ7MweCaIFCAQSKOohVhWCBGIU3hXeGRyKCAR2BcE+BRH8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,595,1418083200"; d="scan'208";a="393831317"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2015 22:05:38 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com [173.36.12.83]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t1HM5bsn031958 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 17 Feb 2015 22:05:37 GMT
Received: from [10.129.24.61] (10.129.24.61) by xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com (173.36.12.83) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:05:37 -0600
Message-ID: <54E3BB30.2030501@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:05:36 -0700
From: ⌘ Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
References: <20150216170123.GR1260@mournblade.imrryr.org> <54E22A70.8050705@cisco.com> <20150216180813.GT1260@mournblade.imrryr.org> <54E265A3.8040201@cisco.com> <1936971F-ED29-45AD-8683-E449DC9330F8@ogud.com>
In-Reply-To: <1936971F-ED29-45AD-8683-E449DC9330F8@ogud.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.129.24.61]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/8f3LLAgNk558tQ4MedEUbTXNN8g>
Cc: dane@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dane] srv-09 comments
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 22:05:40 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512


On 2/17/15 3:01 PM, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:
> Matt, thank you for updating the draft based on last call comments.
>  I have verified that you seem to have addressed all the comments
> that I noted. I like the new definitions you added they add
> clarity, thanks.
> 
> But I noticed some “strange language” I section 3.1 you say in
> paragraph 2: For this specification to apply, the entire DNS RRset
> that is returned MUST be “secure” …
> 
> Well the word entire is redundant if you are talking about single
> DNS RRset, BUT I think there are missing words i.e. the sentence
> should be:
> 
> For this specification to apply, the entire chain of  DNS RRset(s)
> that is returned MUST be “secure” …
> 
> If the second interpretation is right some minor word-smithing in 
> paragraph 3 is also needed.
> 
> Olafur as document Shepard
> 
> 
> 

Thanks for the catch!  The intent is the second interpretation.

I'll get an update (which will be revision -11) out soon.


- -- 
- - m&m

Matt Miller < mamille2@cisco.com >
Cisco Systems, Inc.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJU47swAAoJEDWi+S0W7cO1G50IAKgd6Gt4wbY4/vOWbzAhjWAV
dEFF9+z58QFUJ2xJ1sW0x95w10py8iH1BvPyiZXA++x68fbNjiUly29cnHa8Csfq
SunGRY36yOOLjSxLcADkN7lwYznNVJEjWF8tLyoh2I1kcu+jW5MLGCn88/twZe09
H0aK7NlW5+Oyant22DkdnPC7VRhp6YR64CdmPmI+JQrfM/MpTulzOROD0E/T3hfe
lpjkh4i6Pxs7rEOx1Z7glci5RdzGE70QacuRt95s9/rn3ixoBI1w7y43eMWc/Xri
JyzayGIyw0p7C1txBQhGxk8jgPOjDcQKt6blmBULu/rPdGmwkwEdwoXRhANR7hM=
=a1JU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email