Re: [dane] WGLC: DANE-SRV & DANE-SMTP

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Wed, 26 November 2014 00:33 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F761A89B3 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:33:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rYcH8fNIKglX for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:33:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f179.google.com (mail-ie0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDAE11A89A6 for <dane@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:33:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id rp18so1713430iec.10 for <dane@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:33:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ff9bwuvly0YSVkD25Uugw+HRbtRfOn8gKUnYDuT/cLs=; b=GQU4hFLZYGbnqLDL7gmLcPx4tkDBOD+ebbDquJRlLLRrLX50E1AHOMJj+byEaeumBI 5ZSm+I6SYyw+frTksp1GKpp27UQ+z0LkOqthnmFovYK9UbDM7l2cEgRiDBTuu00Wff13 lNjvgPQDn6KrkuYhjZUkLvuw8GIdm1M+/mNHcTx25XHZBGiunI9+++r9i9ww8A3EVyuh x0NpjvNpiX3Jrvro9h8l7d5UN5pUbFKlcxa25FRIeV7iNmOkEuC4zfG1s1g8T0cRSPl6 6lbRTzvhrSPkXvMqDbdUTPpJaRwbA7A3DvTUPqjHaSkay2OlqGWtI2IeqKuUF0ViNnHb Y9Wg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnVTXtCoz2olUm0ebL70l+0xwYchPXGrhrSK1UEo8mhvClpmOGdU0FdyMocG1uVR/l0bJxr
X-Received: by 10.50.67.113 with SMTP id m17mr513502igt.4.1416961993260; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:33:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aither.local (c-73-34-202-214.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [73.34.202.214]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d1sm1800438igz.13.2014.11.25.16.33.12 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:33:12 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54751FC7.7010303@andyet.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:33:11 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
References: <0DAFC2A8-A1E2-46F4-BA52-E8261CB09159@ogud.com> <20141125094118.GA25246@sources.org>
In-Reply-To: <20141125094118.GA25246@sources.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/9EjvrygxVPRa4aMuUmuNfoOLCVM
Cc: "<dane@ietf.org>" <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] WGLC: DANE-SRV & DANE-SMTP
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:33:15 -0000

On 11/25/14, 2:41 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 06:09:41PM -1000,
>   Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> wrote
>   a message of 71 lines which said:
>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dane/draft-ietf-dane-srv
>
> I have read and checked draft-ietf-dane-srv-08 and I think it is fine
> and ready. The main choice (checking the target domain rather than the
> service domain) seems reasonable and well explained in appendix B.
>
> Editorial :
>
>> Mail messages submitted for addresses at example.com are sent via
>> IMAP to imap.example.net.
>
> Sent via IMAP? Wouldn't it be better to write "Mail messages received
> for addresses at example.com are retrieved via IMAP to
> imap.example.net"?

Yes, we'll fix that silly mistake.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://andyet.com/