IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] DNS errors text

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Tue, 21 October 2014 21:45 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA111A87A7 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IChOojvgJI6z for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-f178.google.com (mail-ie0-f178.google.com [209.85.223.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1FE41A87A5 for <dane@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f178.google.com with SMTP id rl12so2187203iec.37 for <dane@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZKrQY0MQIq3bKLPkT1oTUul/OyxSKy5e9Y+NwDZCpbQ=; b=J8EIkM5TJtoQcCapD3xsTJu6OPBbZBI9aaAQQNGSsqvs8sGsodxzTJR8mF6sMOycvu jflkBs0UiMQSseDSSAvPAsl/9UNZxRNBZbnenZPBvizJ7vUuY6+pFv9VVUgFbM1xDN1d fjGG+yrfEH1WOY2DTjBY4LsKQKcTYH5rrXOB2CdNb8aIZNCjXyNlwUHa++tuBE+qZyQh TVO0M3ZNfXCy4aUbut7Dz49WNZukqAttsfBdm9PyNbZ46/QE2kzCpH7QqRmlLQpvgH+Q IS08TEpbaA/puZwcPeTITu92P3lXUHJs50kl4waErM/1m8gi/xHmJe074qlXa6ukovvI 6vIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkrmTVV0LlwAeanyWwdVVfMuLYY744We6G2nvzXvYr9TNdCotV75ohDzP/bTdQGaRnQsCvx
X-Received: by 10.42.49.8 with SMTP id u8mr779623icf.39.1413927944801; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local (c-73-34-202-214.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [73.34.202.214]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b4sm6648415iod.37.2014.10.21.14.45.43 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5446D406.6000502@andyet.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 15:45:42 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
References: <542CB20B.4020803@andyet.net> <7D2E911A-9D78-4242-A61D-7704DE4A60D4@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <7D2E911A-9D78-4242-A61D-7704DE4A60D4@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/A9f47Vs3ynt0fNA7as0SPDdHTOE
Cc: "<dane@ietf.org>" <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] DNS errors text
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 21:45:47 -0000

On 10/1/14, 8:13 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Oct 1, 2014, at 7:01 PM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> wrote:
>
>> Section 2.1 of draft-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane has some thorough text on DNS errors. Viktor suggested that draft-ietf-dane-srv needs the same text. I would strongly prefer NOT to have the same text in two documents for various reasons. When I mentioned this to the chairs, they suggested moving the text from the SMTP document to the SRV document since it is more generic. I don't really care where it lives, I just want it to be in one place. What do WG participants think?
>
> As long as the SMTP document points to the SRV document for the errors, it's fine to have it live in the SRV document.

Matt and I talked about this, and we're more comfortable with having 
this text live in the SMTP document and pointing there from the SRV 
document. Viktor cares more and knows more about this topic than the 
dane-srv authors, so we think it's best to leave things as-is.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://andyet.com/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email