IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] Review of draft-ietf-dane-smime-15

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Fri, 10 March 2017 03:19 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C718612956B for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 19:19:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.934
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.934 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mt1G1ECtbG7s for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 19:19:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8B7B129549 for <dane@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 19:19:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resomta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.102]) by resqmta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id mB5KcMlTZdEjjmB5icSrkJ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 03:19:42 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([IPv6:2601:192:4603:9471:222:fbff:fe91:d396]) by resomta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id mB5ecHnhgX9UpmB5fcE1ui; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 03:19:40 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id v2A3Jbnk003173; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 22:19:37 -0500
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id v2A3Japl003170; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 22:19:36 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <29A4B86C-C922-41D5-9062-1FD1859CB0A3@vpnc.org> (paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 22:19:36 -0500
Message-ID: <87varh7r93.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfLN+7wxOavLYLhJ4BAEUakESXQE3hNJMChSA3pHyWWRLqhJrlzMSTgB7g9diBbLJwHveo2FUyTSeAX4koyu/VcmRPkMqxceb9RoImAIfbpbNCdDCMdZt 8YOgZEhrFRm2pGgkWGk73jIEOCGvvgbA7BJtKSTR8iYRtAGMQQWwxmVP8wuQG4nthgEfHVFl7JErn220xSCbLVr4HA+juHqfTRUMzft1YMVPcgfORzWY1Pnp 4Sbw0e1By3iyStQLtObenQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/Aqo-TUcZq5sbnePBSnCr0dJpk4w>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, dane@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dane] Review of draft-ietf-dane-smime-15
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 03:19:44 -0000

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> writes:
> On 8 Mar 2017, at 6:35, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>> Thanks Dale for the detailed review and the discussion.
>>
>> I've had a read through the resulting thread and don't
>> see anything that wasn't discussed in the WG that needs
>> a major change (please do yell if I've missed something),
>> so I'll leave this on the March 16th IESG telechat for
>> IESG evaluation. (In part to try get this document done
>> before I'm finished as an AD so we can cleanly close the
>> dane WG:-)
>>
>> That said, I've not seen a response from the authors to
>> the details below, and it'd be good to see that, so
>> authors, please do reply to this and make any editorial
>> changes needed. If you can do have those changes done
>> by the end of Friday (or close-to) that'd be great so
>> it's not changing while the IESG are reading it.
>
> We have read the thread and see that Dale's concerns were met by Paul's 
> "this was already discussed". We haven't see any other messages since 
> the publication that would require a -16, but let's see what the IESG 
> discussion teases out.

My interpretation is that my technical points are covered by "this was
already discussed", and that Stephen was inquiring about the
editorial/nits items (the "details below").

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email