Re: [dane] [saag] Need better opportunistic terminology

Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Thu, 13 March 2014 02:27 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A962F1A0882; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FTpLbpb_UiNb; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:27:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x22e.google.com (mail-la0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E75D1A0877; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f46.google.com with SMTP id hr17so242542lab.5 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:27:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=pWSJJjYuWwwJX8IfEfzo1Cgx/nTk/z7byCap2ZmkXGQ=; b=bQXCbul620IGbGdw7DzKk3mJhli4/hX73QTbLcdSgRYVCH3skBuI13p+Ath0/HmYLW 5QfJm9E8J27yo8i7+Wt4Oa6nV556f/c4F20tXHLXKFCgRVI4614EXdvo+OjFEp7sSTxp a0dxoVwm81vigRQifpFdTiU9Y59FeFKwIbEqR/6fiAn18//Zn6+WweabOBv0uwd0XDMG NS388I6iWhOE9t9daVZ9eaonZJmfBTKMUBr/zS2efeILP66okY3ap2laM97GDsWgq53S wXRqoqF4EJzjo985gTelxxErYYT/WfqxDv4hGq2YTBiHSRaGzwkNOS6sxMe8yCXHsZnm ddRA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.129.168 with SMTP id nx8mr43388lbb.37.1394677666493; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:27:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.234.229 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:27:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5320D5C8.8030509@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <CAMm+LwjF9To+w3K4RR=72BbLNE2hJa9CibWOEARYmODiuFNu9g@mail.gmail.com> <082D04F9-DBB4-4492-BE91-C4E3616AC24D@isi.edu> <531F85D5.2070209@bbn.com> <531F8A53.1040103@isi.edu> <531F8E5F.8030705@isi.edu> <20140312062756.GN11878@anguilla.noreply.org> <3454.1394657237@sandelman.ca> <5320C932.3010107@cs.tcd.ie> <10021.1394658818@sandelman.ca> <5320D5C8.8030509@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 22:27:46 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwh8MY1_i0L1U=w34wjODozktJqCdeG8F5kw+omygH0uJg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b343d68e33ab304f473b2e0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/BJmmbfINBlzn8XjVQBJeJGrTlDc
Cc: Peter Palfrader <peter@palfrader.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, saag <saag@ietf.org>, "dane@ietf.org" <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] [saag] Need better opportunistic terminology
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 02:27:57 -0000

I don't particularly mind what the definition is, provided I can know what
the speaker means by it. Which right now I don't. I am quite happy if we
defer the definition of what OE is until we have decided what to do and
then decide that that is OE by definition.


Some terms that come to mind for encryption using credentials that are not
authenticated:

Faith-Based Encryption
Passive Protection
Junk Encryption (cf Junk bonds which are worth a lot more than zero but a
lot less than par)