IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] namespace management, DANE Client Authentication draft updated

Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com> Fri, 12 April 2019 01:08 UTC

Return-Path: <shuque@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA49120464 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6zRsUEAzpMtB for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-x136.google.com (mail-it1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C83A1200A0 for <dane@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-x136.google.com with SMTP id x132so13015355itf.2 for <dane@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=efr1e6b0GCtWPneDbfc4ayOgZNWZyXnP1ho2D6G37po=; b=CdN6eF1n3uARqn7D+vCGS4klElD02IJdFS3j40mBoy69TDBc25uQAqHwonGf1LpATR xfoySBBX9FfgiCYes7eON97TxjMHY45+tJkHuErVKxrh7UtgJjelMeBa++/0czicTziX uYsBapGdL+zQbJjNZ0otDojNKQ39fPqc5JN2PQj/CFIu6LNDwAFDe/H+us1KDOahuVCz h2utttfydSyJ5Vz6nXCc0dlzsxQrBg1nlfcED8VZaNmIWM/Y95d+7Zat/mq1Bb5mQFek PMmcuHbBsVI6IasEgX8YU7vRd6lSwgq4oQGJkM6T9VRoIwN496pMvY/5cd/OLrxpvNDe C/Ng==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=efr1e6b0GCtWPneDbfc4ayOgZNWZyXnP1ho2D6G37po=; b=ufDfdNPKP7jW0Ab9HiHv2XNwv/+rxpaD54zdZJfC41f564jZUIPj3iMNiWrZ2drzKr PwtvHv6WpBIQbLNR4X97n8PnjjdbGC2OPYaGHwytPKj+wFrm3vrAeeS1FqBeFhfd72zz QKrMlNsJblZNbH/d+sa38XbP47D8hcVLjudhky4Gin0eXVNXX6LrYZ3QaZdzP7hZoiT9 7vmyZmqZx9n+rgjkPOVImzWuHI7PLXWeNaEnzSPh3MWOVleV7RwSN972lRsOYQpoOS/W G2egeNCzFiZ0CyfcX5r86R04Y0HPGixLB2d9vcbuqmWutVuFTST9cKJzdDsN5tT91PbY Zn3w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWkhzEw91lGesasM+aQ6g5PvfvDtL6/m4kYM/JZm5pv2FiUzyge M8dB+kpIvgbWD0Y1zRRXs5u01bS/soXWnBK37VcErA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw3/vajimiPVnphkRi6crGJTCP8pfskzQE/1U/cvMzfemc8s7BGMPohuMMt0FhZ+PUkhl2qy5nul5Dy1ZKmGkc=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:89c3:: with SMTP id s186mr11659939itd.112.1555031301495; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20160114024910.67019.qmail@ary.lan> <1b9fca81-c4cf-6f15-b9ee-bef4eef1320a@afnic.fr> <1B9C84C7-A1DE-48DE-AD2B-4340CBD3F0DC@dukhovni.org>
In-Reply-To: <1B9C84C7-A1DE-48DE-AD2B-4340CBD3F0DC@dukhovni.org>
From: Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 21:08:10 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHPuVdVT1qOK9pWHdF2ypkgSjOwr2bBnNdGXFVbPtSHmKRjOaA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<dane@ietf.org>" <dane@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000057210a05864af076"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/CLOdoHOurrN8IgOpvDqrJO1tEN0>
Subject: Re: [dane] namespace management, DANE Client Authentication draft updated
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 01:08:24 -0000

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 1:14 PM Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
wrote:

> > On Apr 11, 2019, at 6:57 AM, Sandoche Balakrichenan <
> sandoche.balakrichenan@afnic.fr> wrote:
> >
> > I have an Internet of Things (IoT) use-case, in which i am evaluating
> > using TLSA RR for both server and client authentication.
> >
> > For the client authentication mechanism during TLS handshake, the DANE
> > client authentication draft seems to be in the right direction.
> >
> > Is the draft not updated (since 2017) because the draft is not viable
> > operationally or is it just due to lack of interest?
> >
> > I did not get this information from the mailing list archive.
>
> The working group shut down before we had a chance to resume progress
> on the draft.  There are no fundamental barriers to continuing work,
> and I've seen some interest in DANE client auth now and then from others.
>
> At this point the work might need to happen in UTA, if they're willing
> to adopt it.
>
> --
>         Viktor.
>

If there is additional interest in this draft now, and we can find a home
for
the work, I would be happy to revive it and try to push it forward.

Shumon.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email