Re: [dane] email canonicalization for SMIMEA owner names

"John Levine" <> Thu, 11 December 2014 22:51 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2716D1A711A for <>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:51:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.862
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.862 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aw6DV9rgmizr for <>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:51:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38B821A1AA9 for <>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:51:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 87241 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2014 22:50:56 -0000
Received: from ( by with QMQP; 11 Dec 2014 22:50:56 -0000
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:50:38 -0000
Message-ID: <20141211225038.10634.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <>
In-Reply-To: <>
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [dane] email canonicalization for SMIMEA owner names
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:51:02 -0000

>So I thought about punycode RFC3492. I know the RFC might only be for domains, but I asked
>myself, why this would not be applied to a local part as well.

Mailboxes can contain characters not valid in punycode.  Mailboxes in
regular ASCII mail can contain spaces and ASCII graphics.  Mailboxes
in EAI mail can include arbitrary UTF-8.

You could imagine a punycode-like encoding for mailboxes, or perhaps
something more like quoted printable, but punycode or A-labels aren't

Also keep in mind that RFC 5321 says that mailbox names are opaque, so
any case folding we do is technically wrong.  But in practice everyone
expects case folded mailboxes to work, so even mail purists are likely
to grumble but admit that a hack like Viktor's optional lower case is

R's, John