Re: [dane] Future working group documents

Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> Tue, 11 November 2014 09:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E8141A8549 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 01:00:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.267
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.267 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8FChhLcbFnGU for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 01:00:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp140.dfw.emailsrvr.com (smtp140.dfw.emailsrvr.com [67.192.241.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AD361A8978 for <dane@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 01:00:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp30.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9262D1800D7 for <dane@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 04:00:11 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: OK
Received: by smtp30.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: ogud-AT-ogud.com) with ESMTPSA id 11E5E1801A1 for <dane@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 04:00:10 -0500 (EST)
X-Sender-Id: ogud@ogud.com
Received: from dhcp-8e21.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-8e21.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.142.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:465 (trex/5.3.2); Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:00:11 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
In-Reply-To: <20141111051827.GR161@mournblade.imrryr.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 23:00:09 -1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8D065AE0-DF9B-45D2-AE9D-F964A8396EAF@ogud.com>
References: <1415675350.32919149@apps.rackspace.com> <20141111051827.GR161@mournblade.imrryr.org>
To: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/Fcfe6F_omDjpEaieR8SbZJe8_Vg
Subject: Re: [dane] Future working group documents
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:00:15 -0000

On Nov 10, 2014, at 7:18 PM, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:09:10PM -0500, ogud@ogud.com wrote:
> 
>> Jun 2015!  Advance DANE reverse binding (server to client) document to IESG!
> 
> I'll probably pitch in on this one, but it would nice if someone
> else took the lead for a change.
> 
>> Sep 2015!  Advance DANE RFC6698 and DANE SRV RFC to Internet Standard!
> 
> Perhaps before we advance 6698 to full standard we really should
> do a TLSAbis, incorporating the relevant bits of OPS.  The standard
> would be far more readable if it were not substantially refined by
> a second document that is not in turn a full replacement.

What that was meant to be a single document covering both of these 

	Olafur