IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] Meeting in Hawaii?

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Mon, 06 October 2014 02:05 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A32131A02D8 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 19:05:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I_qCjiissGvL for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 19:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mournblade.imrryr.org (mournblade.imrryr.org [38.117.134.19]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D3931A02D9 for <dane@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 19:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mournblade.imrryr.org (Postfix, from userid 1034) id 4245C2AB24B; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 02:05:41 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 02:05:41 +0000
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
To: dane@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20141006020540.GP13254@mournblade.imrryr.org>
References: <CAHw9_iLV1uWX2Fg5H9dBaMr=DsrGmyB_BJteP-kBA0MnXCkJ2w@mail.gmail.com> <E36D8CE6-F5E8-4606-950D-430FEAEA3523@kirei.se> <4C36FDC5-12D2-48C1-A3D5-7AA4090E98C8@isoc.org> <20141002233017.GQ13254@mournblade.imrryr.org> <21940.1412298125@sandelman.ca> <20141003021156.GR13254@mournblade.imrryr.org> <5431B1BE.2030008@hexonet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5431B1BE.2030008@hexonet.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/Fd3ZPlJ7TWL-rpztvMwWYKRpBsU
Subject: Re: [dane] Meeting in Hawaii?
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dane@ietf.org
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 02:05:44 -0000

On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 11:01:50PM +0200, Jens Wagner wrote:

> >I don't understand the issues in detail.  Perhaps Jens Wagner will
> >respond.
> 
> It's a question of the publication infrastructure.
> 
> Right now, PowerDNS is the only (open source) DNS server supporting both
> DNSSEC and large zone counts (unlike the typical registry setup, where you
> manage a small number of huge zonefiles).

Can you shed a bit more light on the ways in which BIND/unbound/...
are not entirely suitable to serving a very large dynamic number
of zones?

What are the main obstacles? Does, for example, BIND take too long
to start/reload? Is adding a new zone too disruptive? Something
else?

-- 
	Viktor.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email