IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] [EXTERNAL] Re: Summary of second WGLC for dane-smime

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 01 December 2016 02:22 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F7D12956B for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:22:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a_nsE9WZcOMp for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:22:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD29F129407 for <dane@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:21:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3tTgyq23FJz9xm; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 03:21:55 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1480558915; bh=//JBl6IBiwDNIFWaNOQRtJTSgGOQKoF7nH667AEtVLA=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=DFnbIH1cN7to9i9/jPosKdJ6Oh8NM6XdXu5ZXJyA+qjDWUr817eqvyNl41xPvlWXh L9nk+C7YFxtkRRBGSu3P4p0MXVTp1TGlWC2MxYwHEH/3QgdhceyLNbgS9a8KsUokS8 0KwXNc4oz9BPgZ87jDVWQxvnE9fMbStzkru7Sqn0=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xPwyTIpOHwd6; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 03:21:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (206-248-139-105.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.139.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 03:21:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7E5F731ED9D; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 21:21:50 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 bofh.nohats.ca 7E5F731ED9D
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B4F640D3581; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 21:21:50 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 21:21:50 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <3C468942-EBF6-482D-A129-C7E171D0D76A@vpnc.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1611302121150.11312@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <4C217351-FA2A-4B28-9D17-652FF36D3528@ogud.com> <4C0D7E57-C931-4D3E-B6E6-F9EA1F941773@vpnc.org> <D6B55A4D-261A-4D1B-82A1-9E6C34F1E447@icann.org> <CAP8yD=sH29qkXHxukjn+tovodHWFgGqqEVF0yTG4CrAMVPwkTQ@mail.gmail.com> <3C468942-EBF6-482D-A129-C7E171D0D76A@vpnc.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LRH 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/FjEG0tp430kHG8V1-Ne6kmdWox0>
Cc: dane WG list <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] [EXTERNAL] Re: Summary of second WGLC for dane-smime
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 02:22:03 -0000

On Wed, 30 Nov 2016, Paul Hoffman wrote:

> On 30 Nov 2016, at 6:33, Allison Mankin wrote:
>
>> I think this reference might work as an early archival discussion of
>> rainbow tables for efficient hash breaking:
>>
>>
>> www.iacr.org/cryptodb/archive/2003/CRYPTO/1615/1615.ps
>
> Thanks, this looks fine. We have updated the draft.

The latest version addresses the issues I had raised. Thanks!

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email