IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] Adopting draft-wouters-dane-openpgp and draft-wouters-dane-openpgpkey-usage

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Wed, 02 April 2014 16:30 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162AB1A01FB for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 09:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id miSpBcJq1ro1 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 09:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com (mail-la0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E161A023E for <dane@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 09:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id mc6so374606lab.13 for <dane@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 09:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=yKMtTQMAB8zrF4GhLLBSfr7k/r03ZekizKlTraTtCao=; b=eXesO5Zxlq3dRi2BsEhOJMqEHyxAWdbvf4ZWWQLdbMIX1cmqgpHe9JUenwQHszvS4z u8UGawC4DCEOCFKV5rsakdWnobZhhYlCU15OHVrsTa8Fn5rt4OZReM7feSClmz6ixGxy 1FgjAxLcCF8dfCz1iNGh3syqSKyBBoE/hlVfdgEAr4H0aUegff/VeVjukPEWCLXkRWv3 xNCDIckyHEkK4iWzxiwEbxGSIkd/gNIYFz5vEmdWio4ET8RfexESwZKd5rD54emeRelp vQDhfPgnEejp5tSqYE/Aybl7Lwdwf20S7vDyhKe1KkMH+zDttdmySFDwpKsyvLCCowOs oYgQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmcJCekiAMca7nvCXJ5WY5SQXeKOV0dILezWDrLssXXBmp6ygviY4djHxmSgDcZqhemaFFK
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.89.234 with SMTP id br10mr625345lbb.60.1396456220062; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 09:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.0.243 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 09:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [98.244.98.35]
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwbvDYnDTh2D-CQjtSg4k94Tr9dT_F065Lx9HcA+seOuQw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHw9_i+8KHP+X0KiCw1ikirnBStMOtYjcaCZz9fWKSrPkA6qJg@mail.gmail.com> <B8E33ED0-6A10-41DF-9D3C-4780C0BE5371@kirei.se> <CAHw9_i+pCJPuDHgTfkvwHDxDWC=Y1HDnz8L63ehfAN6hRdxicA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwbvDYnDTh2D-CQjtSg4k94Tr9dT_F065Lx9HcA+seOuQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 00:30:20 +0800
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iLVy6-a-Vm3MfSPmR6ZM57BT5+eE0Ey=ts0TSh5uDD2+g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/HrCUR6nXgsjtbHQXnRnkyn1qTHk
Cc: "<dane@ietf.org>" <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] Adopting draft-wouters-dane-openpgp and draft-wouters-dane-openpgpkey-usage
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 16:30:29 -0000

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote:
> This may be an ignorant question, but why would DANE handle these?  They
> barely make reference to DANE at all, and certainly not in a normative
> sense.


Apologies for the delay in responding. Travel got in the way...

The DANE WG charter / objective says:
"Specify mechanisms and techniques that allow Internet applications to
establish cryptographically secured communications by using information
distributed through DNSSEC for discovering and authenticating public
keys which are associated with a service located at a domain name."

So, even though this isn't TLSA, it fits nicely in our charter.
We've chatted about this, and the support from others, and would like
to adopt the drafts.

Paul, can you please resubmit as draft-ietf-dane- ?

W

>
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Jakob Schlyter <jakob@kirei.se> wrote:
>> > On 18 feb 2014, at 16:11, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-wouters-dane-openpgp and
>> >> draft-wouters-dane-openpgpkey-usage.
>> >>
>> >> These drafts are available here:
>> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wouters-dane-openpgp/
>> >> and
>> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wouters-dane-openpgpkey-usage/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Please review these two draft to see if you think if they are suitable
>> >> for adoption by the DANE WG.
>> >
>> > Yes, please adopt.
>>
>> Great,  thanks for all the feedback we have received so far. These
>> will be (briefly) discussed tomorrow at the f2f meeting, but feel free
>> to carry on providing feedback as well (those that haven't)
>>
>> W
>>
>>
>> >
>> >         jakob
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dane mailing list
>> dane@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email