IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] On the PKIX-TA / PKIX-CA question? [ One week WGLC ]

John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com> Mon, 02 December 2013 23:05 UTC

Return-Path: <gnu@toad.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C721ADF9D for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 15:05:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.452
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.452 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT=1.449, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yrCt4_qcFPjk for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 15:05:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from new.toad.com (new.toad.com [209.237.225.253]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E3771ADF9B for <dane@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 15:05:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from new.toad.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by new.toad.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id rB2N5doW027178 for <dane@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 15:05:39 -0800
Message-Id: <201312022305.rB2N5doW027178@new.toad.com>
To: dane@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20131202203241.GM761@mournblade.imrryr.org>
References: <A06891E1-01E0-40CC-A9A2-171CAA39AB79@kumari.net> <20131202203241.GM761@mournblade.imrryr.org>
Comments: In-reply-to Viktor Dukhovni <viktor1dane@dukhovni.org> message dated "Mon, 02 Dec 2013 20:32:41 +0000."
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 15:05:39 -0800
From: John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>
Subject: Re: [dane] On the PKIX-TA / PKIX-CA question? [ One week WGLC ]
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 23:05:42 -0000

I propose that we reject the draft entirely and stick with numbers.
If we can't agree on the acronyms, can we stop rearranging the deck
chairs?  A focus on making "running code" for the current DANE RFC
would produce far more deployment than replacing numbers with words.

	John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email