Re: [dane] On the PKIX-TA / PKIX-CA question? [ One week WGLC ]

Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Wed, 11 December 2013 12:54 UTC

Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8AC1AD8EC for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 04:54:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.38
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.38 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PMbuWJAkY675 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 04:54:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ve0-x231.google.com (mail-ve0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB241ACC87 for <dane@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 04:54:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ve0-f177.google.com with SMTP id db12so5882730veb.36 for <dane@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 04:54:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=08C1X6fj3qPGde0TZtZKOR0jHEtTVsDbnMNd9z8ZITw=; b=kOWcImxyHIAWBgS+dGPWXjGjbCxy8c5VbAHsqnzcLEbAiF3ZLvwOz1cr840xKBtzgK /vv+EuFdoiioi3bmfHx0X3PJhtlJ5xVfV6hRaw3vd+AHuxGAsYPtQxdu6PdN6dZqzp84 3s4IRfEgbximhoEcPG62b4ekQRPHZSWo1YI1SKxkD2dTlZjIGeoyEFkATPTITtD8Hd7y WmMcpcGSf50FqTXD4GW+ZvJ+5I1U7PG/As4daClivBoX+dmOH4e+AEYzshhMGPaWLamK zf0WWls0FIwFbTBzRfAqDtXZ7iCgeuGkeG/QrCrYSWmq+r+GvjjJ9AE0irVuIDiP8PN1 Uzbw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=08C1X6fj3qPGde0TZtZKOR0jHEtTVsDbnMNd9z8ZITw=; b=nAGRlPcicd1+2Mta8HelrlYgDO1hnfImdRO8AljA+VL6RSldzVE/tS4obt1fH6Pm06 ymW05ULVlGlhky8hCZTWydn/VzY3rN51XEnbzFq6w6HPpF7l+xXoNTpwb3ngbnEX26u7 iZ6t4s4ATSoDhjcIBlDsXq9ESn56hODVBQB94izEUgVTDA/to3O0dABk4LG76BOO1YE7 0S+ajipK6dPZX2jQ7WEbOOu2zsQ6bknAqiaxj/LgV2F62urHkRDLNPfzHmKDXGHfiQxg aZAvlVx5lBkO4aolEgyZR+ooE2DIzBWp0yqgOWzZdavbOuc7R3bM1EfcK9U60iFmlcnh q8oA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnPpVUVOt0AAdQxvo6YuisxpVUETbzRtSTsSE7BzzkQ0R42atVl10Bm0FeKNhyUtdCL93k6CSKU1cdwQ6somNO1vBPrJCoAOHB4CiVsHowTu691/1qEs7opOZ/jKuO1Z09k5ElyHeMpDl6i+xYSvsNjSXtmmRqVsaWm9schd2HCJQchHO2ua5BxU75GrJhVrrWRGCKs
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.157.232 with SMTP id wp8mr450953vdb.4.1386766473709; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 04:54:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.183.65 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 04:54:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52A7400F.4090402@bbn.com>
References: <A06891E1-01E0-40CC-A9A2-171CAA39AB79@kumari.net> <20131205175314.GH761@mournblade.imrryr.org> <E78C07CA-B742-43B2-8848-33DEB22A8014@kumari.net> <201312080234.rB82YeoW029387@new.toad.com> <m3y53tg0c3.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org> <20131209231919.GY761@mournblade.imrryr.org> <4FAF6906-D258-4AB3-B76C-888C35566097@kirei.se> <20131210073402.GA761@mournblade.imrryr.org> <CABrd9SSSPFOe7HGyFiH=8oP=cvQ-g6HEqBytY8h=bbVonwNR7w@mail.gmail.com> <52A73074.1050904@bbn.com> <CABrd9SR8ttfj5Ymp6GGAmKTQ8KkCHUn_aQrZyZ0+B=tEt_wVTw@mail.gmail.com> <52A7400F.4090402@bbn.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:54:33 +0000
Message-ID: <CABrd9SRx68YqVkP8k1_qBR6Nyc6=2GR02oSbWETjd+gSheXSZA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
To: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: IETF DANE WG list <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] On the PKIX-TA / PKIX-CA question? [ One week WGLC ]
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:54:41 -0000

On 10 December 2013 16:23, Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> wrote:
> Ben,
>
> Thanks for the clarification. I disagree with the relative merit of the
> two approaches, but I don't dispute your observations.

I'm not particularly interested in which is more defective: they both
need fixing.