[dane] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6698 (7975)

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Sat, 08 June 2024 13:36 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2EEC14F701 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Jun 2024 06:36:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.429
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.429 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hapzM9GJ93Go for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Jun 2024 06:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89D71C14F6EA for <dane@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Jun 2024 06:36:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VxJxq6m8Hz3Jb; Sat, 8 Jun 2024 15:36:31 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1717853791; bh=+m/akWCoyRgNZfK379HCw0BmForw81msevOWpAQFG0c=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To; b=maGMMWt+nz5HcmDfbUR06NCJ+Dlnu7sR6TOlgLNywZuP+83z2ImePIhL9C9ANhfEz 24UaAU/ctxCXfE5PJiNbhf4QIG9HvfeqxUQsR9YX5Mgsj1l22sYurCjcxywhMOWjcR GoAt2DwGppSZAs0eCf0dsM+3F5HW+q0rWrGy2eMY=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aPb9zgBm48XT; Sat, 8 Jun 2024 15:36:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sat, 8 Jun 2024 15:36:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [193.110.157.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2DDD4120C89E; Sat, 8 Jun 2024 09:36:29 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-A21CF3B7-DB4B-4197-B565-BD8298C5547A"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2024 09:36:05 -0400
Message-Id: <0796FD14-0E9E-4CD0-911F-1F848DBD738E@nohats.ca>
References: <7ED88306-05F0-4684-8782-44559FF17BA7@ogud.com>
In-Reply-To: <7ED88306-05F0-4684-8782-44559FF17BA7@ogud.com>
To: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (21F90)
Message-ID-Hash: YRKSO3HGY3WMOSOJRKQ67WALIMIEFWZX
X-Message-ID-Hash: YRKSO3HGY3WMOSOJRKQ67WALIMIEFWZX
X-MailFrom: paul@nohats.ca
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dane.ietf.org-0; header-match-dane.ietf.org-1; header-match-dane.ietf.org-2; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, debcooley1@gmail.com, paul.wouters@aiven.io, prod@currently.com, dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [dane] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6698 (7975)
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/NjJtV-y8wLkGOxXFMpMogEON2t8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dane-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dane-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dane-leave@ietf.org>

delete, not reject, is the proper action for spam.

Paul

Sent using a virtual keyboard on a phone

> On Jun 7, 2024, at 23:51, Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> wrote:
> 
> Like Victor says Reject as this is a spam errata filing
> 
>> On Jun 7, 2024, at 10:45 PM, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 02:08:19PM -0700, RFC Errata System wrote:
>>> 
>>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6698,
>>> "The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Transport Layer
>>> Security (TLS) Protocol: TLSA".
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> You may review the report below and at:
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7975
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Type: Technical
>>> Reported by: PJI <prod@currently.com>
>>> 
>>> Section: GLOBAL
>>> 
>>> Original Text
>>> -------------
>>> unlicense 
>>> 
>>> Corrected Text
>>> --------------
>>> unlicense 
>>> 
>>> Notes
>>> -----
>>> 2119
>> 
>> Neither "unlicense" (USA spelling), nor "unlicence" (much of of the rest
>> of the English speaking world) appear in the document, and the erratum,
>> as proposed, is a NOOP.  The word "License" (US), appears only in the
>> RFC2119 boilerplate text.  If the intent is to switch to non-USA
>> spelling (works for me, but good luck with that!), I don't believe that
>> doing that document by document as a "technical" erratum is a productive
>> path forward.
>> 
>> The erratum should be rejected.
>> 
>> -- 
>>    Viktor.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dane mailing list -- dane@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to dane-leave@ietf.org