Re: [dane] Extending TLSA RFC to operate with TLS's new raw public keys

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Fri, 30 May 2014 23:05 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF0E41A0636 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 May 2014 16:05:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.251
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZZhHdaL2iBPV for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 May 2014 16:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.236.43]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092571A0293 for <dane@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 May 2014 16:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (50-1-19-226.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.19.226]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D4552C570; Fri, 30 May 2014 16:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>
References: <201405290805.s4T85HBT008757@new.toad.com> <76254E90-245A-4502-AFBE-74A3038BB08F@vpnc.org> <201405300616.s4U6GwBT015849@new.toad.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 16:05:38 -0700
In-Reply-To: <201405300616.s4U6GwBT015849@new.toad.com> (John Gilmore's message of "Thu, 29 May 2014 23:16:58 -0700")
Message-ID: <0l61kmj29p.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/O-CaJ3M_6JLKdsU3lSj-y3cKlc4
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, dane@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dane] Extending TLSA RFC to operate with TLS's new raw public keys
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 23:05:49 -0000

John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com> writes:

>> That is a horrible abuse of the RFC publication process.
>
...
> I am *asking* for review by the DANE WG.

Another option: put a note about it in the dane-ops draft, which was
discussed at the last WG meeting as potentially being more than an -ops
document in the first place (extending DANE not just defining
operational characteristics).  We're over due for getting that out the
door too.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
Parsons