Re: [dane] Review of DANE SMTP draft

James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> Sat, 15 March 2014 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <cloos@jhcloos.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 166631A017B for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 11:02:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.548
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.548 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tHof9TMErkwH for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 11:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ore.jhcloos.com (ore.jhcloos.com [198.147.23.85]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45DCE1A017D for <dane@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 11:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ore.jhcloos.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 7A3BA1DD11; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 18:01:57 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhcloos.com; s=ore13; t=1394906517; bh=gdF1mMAv33A0fludJAC3hTJKvl4U4p5MJYOVBTmTWSQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=DFeLY7SL90Qjkv0Zf2pHdgGRPqQIW3FPw7T4pqfAzkHcNyBbUymWhjGqtQPB93jHP BdGDj3LktUhdaG5WPO/nAtIWArEouoOiywtk7sF+b2HC0sG42exh3l0GsTmvWzaxs/ nsDEcCE4wCkfMSO1epZL9f3tJXVhwGiFYTHn/uq/ueg==
Received: by carbon.jhcloos.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id B1E0E60021; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 17:59:43 +0000 (UTC)
From: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
To: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor1dane@dukhovni.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140315024203.GW21390@mournblade.imrryr.org> (Viktor Dukhovni's message of "Sat, 15 Mar 2014 02:42:03 +0000")
References: <C28AB0DE-0391-4EA3-8312-DC2D2F7FD167@isode.com> <20140314052342.GQ21390@mournblade.imrryr.org> <m3fvmkb7fu.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org> <20140315024203.GW21390@mournblade.imrryr.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAABAAAAAQAgMAAABinRfyAAAACVBMVEX///8ZGXBQKKnCrDQ3 AAAAJElEQVQImWNgQAAXzwQg4SKASgAlXIEEiwsSIYBEcLaAtMEAADJnB+kKcKioAAAAAElFTkSu QmCC
Copyright: Copyright 2014 James Cloos
OpenPGP: ED7DAEA6; url=http://jhcloos.com/public_key/0xED7DAEA6.asc
OpenPGP-Fingerprint: E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 13:59:43 -0400
Message-ID: <m3pplnz6jb.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
Lines: 16
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Hashcash: 1:30:140315:viktor1dane@dukhovni.org::2TqHpLh+DfCL6y4S:0000000000000000000000000000000000005VSoq
X-Hashcash: 1:30:140315:dane@ietf.org::MrHj1+F22evGIw3r:000NfCLx
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/OUSDo71cmbtRWzNO8bG9C3rfGtI
Cc: dane@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dane] Review of DANE SMTP draft
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 18:02:07 -0000

>>>>> "VD" == Viktor Dukhovni <viktor1dane@dukhovni.org>; writes:

VD> I take it you're suggesting to not perpetuate Postini's abuse of
VD> wildcard certs?

Not really; I'm ambivalent.  And most tls usage lacks uri bars, so it is
less of an issue than it might be for browsers.

VD> Implementations might choose to be more liberal,
VD> but servers can't expect multi-label wildcard support.  Right?

True.

-JimC
--
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>;         OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6