[dane] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-dane-srv-13: (with COMMENT)

["Ben Campbell" <[e-mail]>]

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dane-srv-13: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-srv/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for this.  Protocols using SRV have been left out of the DANE
party for too long :-) But I still have a couple of comments:

3.1, 2nd paragraph (note)

I have mixed emotions about smtp-with-dane as an informational reference.
Putting it in a "note" aside, can one safely implement and use dane-srv
without reading that draft? (If the answer is really "yes", then I'm okay
with it.)

3.2, first paragraph:

Is this meant to imply that one must resolve every SRV target? I would
assume that it follows the normal SRV rules and application protocol
rules, which may or may not result in queries for every SRV target in the
set.