Re: [dane] Lukewarm discussion: DANE for opportunistic TLS protocols

James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> Mon, 17 February 2014 01:01 UTC

Return-Path: <cloos@jhcloos.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04821A0204 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:01:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f4z8JkUqVS6O for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:01:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ore.jhcloos.com (ore.jhcloos.com [198.147.23.85]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54D91A00E0 for <dane@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:01:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ore.jhcloos.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 2AF301DF79; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:01:50 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhcloos.com; s=ore13; t=1392598910; bh=3NOa4981IuP3PN13lLLsE6lomoYdmnhyA5pVOxk4Gd0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=hA0qmI0Z8ECpNzPApY6A8K2BSYwgk6+cEOgey04h5DPLdApqNc+t+Aan4jrv/aKDX JOU8Vnw8Fyll38+U9/Tkl9JCaS/AZ7HH+ENrgpWEg8DpRFoxiBg97B9EdkmCXOx7tw eT2n/x1UnCBVHXkR6HxwXAEyOs6//ZrZF1eyUh4XHsw==
Received: by carbon.jhcloos.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 84FE860021; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:55:21 +0000 (UTC)
From: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <B06F0F91-7200-4ACF-BBB5-7BDC942DBFB8@vpnc.org> (Paul Hoffman's message of "Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:48:32 -0800")
References: <20140214200002.GK278@mournblade.imrryr.org> <m37g8x2trc.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org> <B06F0F91-7200-4ACF-BBB5-7BDC942DBFB8@vpnc.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAABAAAAAQAgMAAABinRfyAAAACVBMVEX///8ZGXBQKKnCrDQ3 AAAAJElEQVQImWNgQAAXzwQg4SKASgAlXIEEiwsSIYBEcLaAtMEAADJnB+kKcKioAAAAAElFTkSu QmCC
Copyright: Copyright 2014 James Cloos
OpenPGP: ED7DAEA6; url=http://jhcloos.com/public_key/0xED7DAEA6.asc
OpenPGP-Fingerprint: E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 19:55:21 -0500
Message-ID: <m3mwhqv9pp.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
Lines: 16
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Hashcash: 1:30:140217:paul.hoffman@vpnc.org::6hfGNHg5njFQM4Fh:000000000000000000000000000000000000000EDsiN
X-Hashcash: 1:30:140217:dane\@ietf.org\::0IBr8gAg7yIMJvQ5:0RclU0
X-Hashcash: 1:30:140217:dane@ietf.org::/EXCovcrznGHhjJO:000SpdiF
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/PfKX2GjhT3F2SQZxLIyqZRC2f_Y
Cc: "<dane@ietf.org>" <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] Lukewarm discussion: DANE for opportunistic TLS protocols
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:01:57 -0000

>>>>> "PH" == Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> writes:

JC>> The only real question is whether dane-srv and dane-smtp-with-dane
JC>> should be published as two rfcs or combined into one?  (I’m leaning
JC>> towards two, numerically adjacent.)

PH> With all due respect, there are other real questions, much more
PH> significant than that one.

Sorry.  That paragraph does not express the tone for which I aimed.

And I should have caught that fact before posting.

-JimC
--
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6