IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] Call for Adoption: draft-hoffman-dane-smime.

"Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com> Mon, 24 September 2012 14:26 UTC

Return-Path: <mamille2@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14E321F8793 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 07:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.508
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.508 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.091, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jd2Mw03kykVC for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 07:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6BE21F878B for <dane@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 07:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5399; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1348496769; x=1349706369; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=4phdzMCuwhEGZgREs0dj7MjX2fzIdIwiP1xrOX4RxEw=; b=Ri6w/oOYJsY+Vms5xJyzGGmrLb/CJHiB91FlvFem0VtH48ZOHKMRCSWA lcuKtcjgplPBLeg29b30qzk9kQu0qbB5yynQtFNolJ55AFnmBpEfcnxbj BcaEZH0QtaAkW/Z1t2r/8vz5JFpIdWHuAlxHcQ6FRe+dKa/sHtc1bax3G w=;
X-Files: smime.p7s, PGP.sig : 2214, 535
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EACttYFCtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABFvj6BCIIgAQEBAwESAQpcBQsCAQgOCicHAjAUEQIEDgUOFIddBpgxn1mLHIVKYAOOa4EghVqOOoFpgmeCFw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.80,476,1344211200"; d="sig'?p7s'?scan'208"; a="124717053"
Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2012 14:26:08 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com [173.37.183.86]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8OEQ8sb029683 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:26:08 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com ([169.254.6.219]) by xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com ([173.37.183.86]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 09:26:08 -0500
From: "Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com>
To: Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>
Thread-Topic: [dane] Call for Adoption: draft-hoffman-dane-smime.
Thread-Index: AQHNmLHKIk0Tzu00CEOWcKpKtd8/jJeZ1eEAgAADXoCAAAfGgIAAAo6A
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:26:08 +0000
Message-ID: <FA8F0CF0-4B85-4C45-81D3-8D874AE66C6B@cisco.com>
References: <BCDB44B9-6AB0-4230-B1EF-FDDB37C77F38@kumari.net> <357AB2FD-DF7E-49EC-B3D6-D0F6BC20A79F@kumari.net> <C93F9961257B4ADFA226AD8C89290362@bbn.com> <20120924134925.GA9495@miek.nl> <F98183AFDDFD449982489E5D3AB81534@bbn.com>
In-Reply-To: <F98183AFDDFD449982489E5D3AB81534@bbn.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-pgp-agent: GPGMail 1.3.3
x-originating-ip: [64.101.72.40]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19206.004
x-tm-as-result: No--27.981000-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Apple-Mail-2-822396445"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<dane@ietf.org>" <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] Call for Adoption: draft-hoffman-dane-smime.
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:26:09 -0000

On Sep 24, 2012, at 08:17, Richard Barnes wrote:

> On Monday, September 24, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Miek Gieben wrote:
>> [ Quoting <rbarnes@bbn.com (mailto:rbarnes@bbn.com)> in "Re: [dane] Call for Adoption: draft..." ]
>> 
>>> -- I don't really see why we need a new RR type here, beyond the cognitive
>>> dissonance caused by the three letters "TLS".
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> new RRs are cheap. Why not get one?
> Why *would* you?  The cert/chain matching semantics are the same, the only difference is how you get the cert/chain (S/MIME vs. TLS).   
> 
> New RRs are not *that* cheap.  Yes, servers and resolvers usually do let you provision arbitrary RR types by number, but that's not nearly as nice as having a real syntax, which takes time to develop and deploy.  If you've got TLSA and you just need people to look for it in a different place, why bother going to the effort of making everyone support a new type?
> 

My thoughts exactly.


- m&m

Matt Miller - <mamille2@cisco.com>
Cisco Systems, Inc.

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status