Re: [dane] AD review of draft-ietf-dane-smime-14

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Mon, 13 February 2017 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F52B128B38 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:33:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pvbU1usxv0rH for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:33:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x231.google.com (mail-qk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FEEE129559 for <dane@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:33:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id p22so8335194qka.0 for <dane@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:33:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=GiXYs9E+1Gb7503KqZ5lCZJgapIxR3OQsCttdeiU+JE=; b=hUgjXqE/NaeMzdzyMYWtBAkTIwqb5KIyIAjUS+7mnbse/nkYh2nJtrh70JvTJTNg0r Jn2GmBJf0mUQ1swjuSUi6KNCboOYwqW+JrGe/V1DKxwUWQ/vg6xCBpdtuijs5NnBMKRd xU/8h8onAHw0R3nlRfQpEx7OxlP4zGVi5u/YNRREdBlTg+D72VrCYFcR6Q+S0tx+LKBJ H4szzT8jh6uKARHdlhITC3IrXwURXRHrc9W+NI+poJ0j1Cf0LrZaN46hpi2z1XX9GdJM lnZ2EBRjJ1mUtwVrMty7zh4lpmk3EtALhOZbAXJdQkXCrNPwbecnvoUodb9kV80OeaxV V9IQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=GiXYs9E+1Gb7503KqZ5lCZJgapIxR3OQsCttdeiU+JE=; b=kkL4VSm9QwjEJf4eNK+ZzgAtPwD05aPnV/KJYaJAqvuFvMnKMrSSLwxjworzObCCY/ RQ4022HnYt+LSjQeBeV8LjQjbEQhDCFbWw3ms1pU7vjnXXz1l2w/7pXHxwrJGrcLMZzJ 1VaEvh2S62MGTKqRaSCCTctYQJu98ra/xgC699LRoLtFXXFnO8dEw81zZwqoj8HhbouN HCAMSAyFd5FIXCQCn2zMbk2OvwbnOPxcAxutked2qdQsgya+22XsLaGm/WwLtIEMYRs1 jcVpS1Vdh2ZeT+BMTr/PiRhMw1S2fEtnEvXoNzuydHpaS5nPyb4Er6H6kuc9OgFTJBiX IOOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nwiOmLEXNU6g3CEkV3teqMPrSVCyzSe0NkiyUtptcUg0/c9O09xGeetoG5fRH+bIdx6nm8YQ8g+a/pqYiI
X-Received: by 10.233.239.17 with SMTP id d17mr21856185qkg.13.1487007194424; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:33:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.179.19 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:32:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_i+kau8q6+rKg-ndKYixqhxZQNHCYA2BZmvwVbPR+fLEKg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c6dc5069-da43-2e70-d5e6-d0e200fb8523@cs.tcd.ie> <20170209041739.17865.qmail@ary.lan> <22938E71-2963-4C6B-BE94-16C7E30FBFD0@sidn.nl> <CAHw9_i+kau8q6+rKg-ndKYixqhxZQNHCYA2BZmvwVbPR+fLEKg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 12:32:44 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iKgYZ1u9VJz2s4tfEka0bJXD5Er9vQiP9H1gtB4Vx=pWg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "dane@ietf.org" <dane@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/URnVje3FAgQ2WuCVOAMB_7mCbec>
Subject: Re: [dane] AD review of draft-ietf-dane-smime-14
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 17:33:17 -0000

Dear WG.

Unless you explicitly let us know that you are NOT OK with the current
IPR declaration ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2468/ ) by
Thursday, we will be progressing the document.
Personally I'm not thrilled with the situation, but I don't really
think there is anything we can do about it...

On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Marc Groeneweg <Marc.Groeneweg@sidn.nl> wrote:
>>>>the IPR declaration's statement that licensing information
>>>>will be provided "later."
>> As we had with the keyrelay draft in regext (and the draft of Peter Koch with DNSSEC transfers).
>
> Can you remind us what ended up happening with those two? I vaguely
> remember some discussion about it being hard to get a commitment, and
> that "later" seemed like a DoS on the process, but was there ever a
> resolution?
>
> Is the WG OK with this, or do you feel that we need to try and get the
> IPR statement updated? (Remembering that, AFAIK, we cannot do anything
> other than ask nicely...)
>
> W
>
>
>>
>> <SNAP/>
>>
>>> I see that Verisign has offered a free-unless-you-sue-us license for
>>> other patent applications, like this one, dunno why they do for some
>>> but not others:
>>>
>>>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2703/
>> Other than that the suggested draft is also by Verisign themselves?
>>
>>> In any event, you alrady know what my suggested solution is.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Marc
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dane mailing list
>> dane@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
>
>
>
> --
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
>    ---maf



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf