Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronym

In message <0ly567rcz0.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net>, Wes Hardaker writes:
> Viktor Dukhovni <viktor1dane@dukhovni.org> writes:
> 
> >>    _666._tcp.first.example.   TLSA 3       1    1        {blob}
> >>    _666._tcp.first.example.   TLSA DANE-TA SPKI SHA2-256 {blob}
> >>
> >>    Something needs to be said for that case; what would an existing
> >>    implementation do?  drop both? take one?  Either way, it should be
> >>    discussed/mentioned.
> >
> > I'm confused I thought these were just user friendly names...  The
> > wire format of the DNS TLSA record is surely unchanged.  In which
> > case it is impossible to publish the second form, it is just an
> > input format in documentation (and perhaps source form zone files
> > in supporting DNS servers), but not a wire format.
> 
> I did actually mean to respond to that and say such, because I realized
> that shortly afterward.  Sorry.
> 
> (though the zone file is still affected, I don't know of any software
> that does partial reads of zone files and only takes the records it can under
> stand)

Any server that does a partial read is not rfc compliant.

> -- 
> Wes Hardaker
> Parsons
> _______________________________________________
> dane mailing list
> dane@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org