Re: [dane] DANE meeting at IETF95 in BA

Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com> Tue, 08 March 2016 06:24 UTC

Return-Path: <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A7E1CE080 for <dane@ietfc.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 22:24:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.41]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mzv09QaD4bbG for <dane@ietfc.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 22:24:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86C151CE07F for <dane@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 22:24:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.123.7] (unknown [75.83.2.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6433222E253; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 01:24:54 -0500 (EST)
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, dane@ietf.org
References: <20160307124637.1102.qmail@ary.lan>
From: Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
Message-ID: <56DE6FDC.1060001@seantek.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 22:23:24 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160307124637.1102.qmail@ary.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/XJAy7KPzSllzFhCLjE1W1tOIBfw>
Subject: Re: [dane] DANE meeting at IETF95 in BA
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 06:24:56 -0000

On 3/7/2016 4:46 AM, John Levine wrote:
> In article <CAHw9_iKvW4_KyW7gCoXRDNRHqVp9HxY9t8gk3h8FrE-xeWOdKA@mail.gmail.com> you write:
>> -=-=-=-=-=-
>> -=-=-=-=-=-
>>
>> So, it seems that the primary authors of many our documents will not be
>> able to make it to Buenos Aires, and, we still have not received any call
>> for agenda items.
> If you meet, I'd like to present draft-bhjl-x509-srv-00 but if you
> don't meet, that's fine too.

I do not understand what exactly this draft offers over RFC 4387, which 
already defines the HTTP certificate service, the URI formats, and the 
SRV records. I get the vague sense that this draft is an alternative to 
storing individual certificates in the DNS with DANE as 
draft-ietf-dane-smime-10 proposes. (See Section 5 of this draft.)

That being said, it seems reasonable to present at the DANE meeting, so 
I support that.

Sean