Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet?

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Wed, 03 October 2012 19:07 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16AF71F040A for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 12:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2YAb0OF6V+L7 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 12:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vimes.kumari.net (smtp1.kumari.net [204.194.22.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A9121F8516 for <dane@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 12:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.140] (unknown [66.84.81.102]) by vimes.kumari.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C0391B4068C; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 15:07:57 -0400 (EDT)
References: <BD9F1901-911A-49EB-9390-B18D8A9D0B30@nic.cz> <FBCB9053-91C3-4EBC-874E-97067A922E49@nic.cz> <C73CE37F-C34D-4824-AF11-D03F14AE3015@kumari.net> <EC95632A-306A-4E15-8857-667B47B1B92C@kumari.net> <00cd01cda195$11b1dac0$35159040$@augustcellars.com>
In-Reply-To: <00cd01cda195$11b1dac0$35159040$@augustcellars.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Message-Id: <BE0FAA8C-EBBD-40F7-B06A-B1E28450F6BE@kumari.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10A405)
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 15:07:56 -0400
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
Cc: dane WG list <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet?
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:07:59 -0000

Sorry, too many trips... 

Dallas was NANOG -- I meant Atlanta :-)

W

Warren Kumari
------
Please excuse typing, etc -- This was sent from a device with a tiny keyboard.

On Oct 3, 2012, at 2:29 PM, "Jim Schaad" <ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote:

> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dane-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dane-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> Warren Kumari
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 11:06 AM
>> To: Ondrej Surý; Stephen Farrell
>> Cc: dane WG list
>> Subject: Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet?
>> 
>> 
>> On Sep 30, 2012, at 5:00 AM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sep 24, 2012, at 3:10 PM, Ondrej Sur� <ondrej.sury@nic.cz> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> More specifically, we are going to cancel the session after Oct 4th unless
>> we hear from you that you want to meet and we have an agenda.
>>> 
>>> Apologies all -- due to the contention for meeting slots and the difficulty of
>> scheduling all these slots we are moving the cutoff to the 2nd.
>> 
>> And sadly enough it looks like we should cancel this slot.
>> 
>> I am very grateful to folk, Dan especially for wanting to meet, and for being
>> interested in driving adoption, but it simply looks like we will not have a full
>> enough schedule to justify using IETF meeting time�.
>> 
>> We will try and spend some time (finally) getting the new charter organized,
>> and also discuss deployment, etc�
>> 
>> Just to be clear -- DANE WILL NOT BE MEETING IN DALLAS�.
> 
> That is good, the IETF is meeting in Atlanta
> 
> Jim
> 
>> 
>> W
>> 
>> 
>>> W
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> O.
>>>> 
>>>> On 23. 9. 2012, at 12:28, Ondrej Sur� <ondrej.sury@nic.cz> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Dear WG,
>>>>> 
>>>>> we did register a slot for IETF 85 (just in case), but from the volume of
>> the mailing list and just one WG draft (we have just adopted), we are quite
>> unsure if there's enough interest in meeting.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am personally inclined of canceling this meeting and reschedule for
>> next year.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Any comments (if saying yes, please also say why and attach an agenda
>> item suggestion :))?
>>>>> 
>>>>> O.
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ondrej Sur� -- Chief Science Officer
>>>>> -------------------------------------------
>>>>> CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o.    --    Laboratore CZ.NIC
>>>>> Americka 23, 120 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic
>>>>> mailto:ondrej.sury@nic.cz    http://nic.cz/
>>>>> tel:+420.222745110       fax:+420.222745112
>>>>> -------------------------------------------
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> dane mailing list
>>>>> dane@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Ondrej Sur� -- Chief Science Officer
>>>> -------------------------------------------
>>>> CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o.    --    Laboratore CZ.NIC
>>>> Americka 23, 120 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic
>>>> mailto:ondrej.sury@nic.cz    http://nic.cz/
>>>> tel:+420.222745110       fax:+420.222745112
>>>> -------------------------------------------
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dane mailing list
>>>> dane@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> dane mailing list
>> dane@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
>