Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet?
Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Wed, 03 October 2012 19:07 UTC
Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16AF71F040A for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 12:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2YAb0OF6V+L7 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 12:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vimes.kumari.net (smtp1.kumari.net [204.194.22.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A9121F8516 for <dane@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 12:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.140] (unknown [66.84.81.102]) by vimes.kumari.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C0391B4068C; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 15:07:57 -0400 (EDT)
References: <BD9F1901-911A-49EB-9390-B18D8A9D0B30@nic.cz> <FBCB9053-91C3-4EBC-874E-97067A922E49@nic.cz> <C73CE37F-C34D-4824-AF11-D03F14AE3015@kumari.net> <EC95632A-306A-4E15-8857-667B47B1B92C@kumari.net> <00cd01cda195$11b1dac0$35159040$@augustcellars.com>
In-Reply-To: <00cd01cda195$11b1dac0$35159040$@augustcellars.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Message-Id: <BE0FAA8C-EBBD-40F7-B06A-B1E28450F6BE@kumari.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10A405)
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 15:07:56 -0400
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
Cc: dane WG list <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet?
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:07:59 -0000
Sorry, too many trips... Dallas was NANOG -- I meant Atlanta :-) W Warren Kumari ------ Please excuse typing, etc -- This was sent from a device with a tiny keyboard. On Oct 3, 2012, at 2:29 PM, "Jim Schaad" <ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dane-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dane-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> Warren Kumari >> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 11:06 AM >> To: Ondrej Surý; Stephen Farrell >> Cc: dane WG list >> Subject: Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet? >> >> >> On Sep 30, 2012, at 5:00 AM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Sep 24, 2012, at 3:10 PM, Ondrej Sur� <ondrej.sury@nic.cz> wrote: >>> >>>> More specifically, we are going to cancel the session after Oct 4th unless >> we hear from you that you want to meet and we have an agenda. >>> >>> Apologies all -- due to the contention for meeting slots and the difficulty of >> scheduling all these slots we are moving the cutoff to the 2nd. >> >> And sadly enough it looks like we should cancel this slot. >> >> I am very grateful to folk, Dan especially for wanting to meet, and for being >> interested in driving adoption, but it simply looks like we will not have a full >> enough schedule to justify using IETF meeting time�. >> >> We will try and spend some time (finally) getting the new charter organized, >> and also discuss deployment, etc� >> >> Just to be clear -- DANE WILL NOT BE MEETING IN DALLAS�. > > That is good, the IETF is meeting in Atlanta > > Jim > >> >> W >> >> >>> W >>> >>> >>>> O. >>>> >>>> On 23. 9. 2012, at 12:28, Ondrej Sur� <ondrej.sury@nic.cz> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear WG, >>>>> >>>>> we did register a slot for IETF 85 (just in case), but from the volume of >> the mailing list and just one WG draft (we have just adopted), we are quite >> unsure if there's enough interest in meeting. >>>>> >>>>> I am personally inclined of canceling this meeting and reschedule for >> next year. >>>>> >>>>> Any comments (if saying yes, please also say why and attach an agenda >> item suggestion :))? >>>>> >>>>> O. >>>>> -- >>>>> Ondrej Sur� -- Chief Science Officer >>>>> ------------------------------------------- >>>>> CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. -- Laboratore CZ.NIC >>>>> Americka 23, 120 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic >>>>> mailto:ondrej.sury@nic.cz http://nic.cz/ >>>>> tel:+420.222745110 fax:+420.222745112 >>>>> ------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> dane mailing list >>>>> dane@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ondrej Sur� -- Chief Science Officer >>>> ------------------------------------------- >>>> CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. -- Laboratore CZ.NIC >>>> Americka 23, 120 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic >>>> mailto:ondrej.sury@nic.cz http://nic.cz/ >>>> tel:+420.222745110 fax:+420.222745112 >>>> ------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> dane mailing list >>>> dane@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dane mailing list >> dane@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane >
- [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet? Ondřej Surý
- Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet? Ondřej Surý
- Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet? Warren Kumari
- [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet or no… Dan York
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… Dan York
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… SM
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… Dan York
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… Warren Kumari
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… Daniel Piggott
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… Warren Kumari
- Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet? Warren Kumari
- Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet? Jim Schaad
- Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet? Warren Kumari
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… Dan York