Re: [dane] [saag] Need better opportunistic terminology

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 12 March 2014 21:59 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2C51A0764; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rzjoB-ArRdX4; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F311A0758; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84F4BE4D; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 21:59:01 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zG1eRjoJ2xhr; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 21:59:00 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.8] (unknown [86.46.16.238]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CF43BE29; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 21:59:00 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <5320D8A4.1000709@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 21:59:00 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>, saag <saag@ietf.org>
References: <CAMm+LwjF9To+w3K4RR=72BbLNE2hJa9CibWOEARYmODiuFNu9g@mail.gmail.com> <082D04F9-DBB4-4492-BE91-C4E3616AC24D@isi.edu> <531F85D5.2070209@bbn.com> <531F8A53.1040103@isi.edu> <53206293.8020907@bbn.com> <5320900C.2030007@isi.edu> <53209382.3070809@cs.tcd.ie> <5320D7F9.6090504@bbn.com>
In-Reply-To: <5320D7F9.6090504@bbn.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/YwNe4ibYBFhKRGZgdQgg-pGbK3s
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:33:01 -0700
Subject: Re: [dane] [saag] Need better opportunistic terminology
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 21:59:09 -0000

Sure, that's arguable.

My main reason for suggesting UTA is that I figure its
drafts will have more/soonest dependencies on the
terminology draft.

However, if folk prefer saag, for now at least that's
fine. But let's drop the cross-posting to dane then
please? (Which I bcc'd)

S.

On 03/12/2014 09:56 PM, Stephen Kent wrote:
> Stephen,
> 
>> (again, I'd suggest one list for this if we can and the
>> UTA wg list, but hopefully that'll settle down when there's
>> an I-D, and since I'm not the boss of us anyway...:-)
>>
> This is a broader topic than TLS, as later messages from Joe indicated, so
> I don't think UTA is the right place for this discussion.
> 
> Steve
> 
>