Re: [dane] draft-ietf-dane-smime

Jakob Schlyter <jakob@kirei.se> Sun, 09 November 2014 03:33 UTC

Return-Path: <jakob@kirei.se>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A851A017E for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 19:33:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.346
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.346 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lZruDOZJU_6s for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 19:33:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spg.kirei.se (spg.kirei.se [IPv6:2001:67c:394:15::9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E658B1A0113 for <dane@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 19:33:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kirei.se; s=spg20100524; h=received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=uJITlCBWbt2KcPInsGu/jTCh9BYRCINFupp3m+x2fLo=; b=y10WHv5xzrvPIMpy2Huda8vKQrn50BKlF/PSch/JgwRbFz2pR/32wafkR8KsSubbhlQYFwVyE3mbr EVSZXeBpSKFDvGXl1CK3Lo3WzhxVllmANGBgt40MtZ6RpEP5tP/8R8l1Sn89kUfHzdL+an0JL/2jLA 2TSZ3DCDSXLptRYo=
Received: from mail.kirei.se (unknown [91.206.174.10]) by spg-relay.kirei.se (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTPS for <dane@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 04:33:02 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Jakob Schlyter <jakob@kirei.se>
In-Reply-To: <20141101233322.GU19103@mournblade.imrryr.org>
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 17:32:57 -1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <798620D7-6F0A-445B-98D4-A90362711D47@kirei.se>
References: <273F9612-13AF-4CB8-B15C-912AAD04C738@verisign.com> <39C76846-F695-435D-9A5C-6989D06E9573@verisign.com> <20141031172840.GM19103@mournblade.imrryr.org> <F6025049-7FEC-4286-AABF-AB1E47452742@verisign.com> <20141101233322.GU19103@mournblade.imrryr.org>
To: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/Z8ioRPoXBauJZiBRJJPGW2MyYfo
Subject: Re: [dane] draft-ietf-dane-smime
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 03:33:23 -0000

On 1 nov 2014, at 13:33, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> wrote:

>> Yeah, I would say so.  I think this is the case most akin to the TLSA model.  I would say:
>> 0 == use TLSA-style DANE
>> 1 == look for info from a service that is described by NAPTR
>> 2 == Look for info served from a WebFinger service.
> 
> What is the meaning of the associated *DATA* field?  Why should
> this be an SMIMEA record.  I think this is misuse of that record.

I believe the CERT RR would be more appropriate for redirects to other access methods. Or perhaps the proposed URI RR (draft-faltstrom-uri).

The proposal is similar to publishing an MX RR with an extra option to indicate that X.400 should be used for delivery.

	jakob