Re: [dane] email canonicalization for SMIMEA owner names

James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> Fri, 12 December 2014 22:50 UTC

Return-Path: <cloos@jhcloos.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D41C1A0065 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:50:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JlhAHzpsDbEo for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:50:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ore.jhcloos.com (ore.jhcloos.com [IPv6:2604:2880::b24d:a297]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64E4B1A00A7 for <dane@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:50:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ore.jhcloos.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id CBF4C1E240; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 22:50:51 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhcloos.com; s=ore14; t=1418424651; bh=K5bPaE1kXE6eTAEudeK1p+rABfWyI45Sm+5o5haBFP0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=F7nfas03cF/8Reznhq2cllxFdThaqNDsT7pbHsqiPW7ASVxvWmZbzWUZuNS7HA+pA 2VKBn6dJbWO2DgvzQpNQT50V6nspwDYKm03pj8/jPchEKldUxtrrCOCYkNf1B5By/6 v/tkTYTBaA3blaCTdoA8cvVj/kfVkgMMKaUvULXg=
Received: by carbon.jhcloos.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id B08F160023; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 22:50:10 +0000 (UTC)
From: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
To: dane@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20141212175242.GB25666@mournblade.imrryr.org> (Viktor Dukhovni's message of "Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:52:42 +0000")
References: <95826148-4F06-4942-87A4-2F6601BA0F90@nist.gov> <CABrd9SQ1umsP731hvghV92EL5y2P4i++ESyrvxUhJD==z=pKpw@mail.gmail.com> <F79847E4-C748-467F-ADA3-0DBCD5CFE697@nohats.ca> <20141212175242.GB25666@mournblade.imrryr.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux)
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAABAAAAAQAgMAAABinRfyAAAACVBMVEX///8ZGXBQKKnCrDQ3 AAAAJElEQVQImWNgQAAXzwQg4SKASgAlXIEEiwsSIYBEcLaAtMEAADJnB+kKcKioAAAAAElFTkSu QmCC
Copyright: Copyright 2014 James Cloos
OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6; url=https://jhcloos.com/public_key/0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6.asc
OpenPGP-Fingerprint: E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:50:10 -0500
Message-ID: <m3bnn8xz31.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
Lines: 14
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Hashcash: 1:28:141212:dane@ietf.org::ipuDHkJPPhaec6WL:0004GWKh
X-Hashcash: 1:28:141212:ietf-dane@dukhovni.org::FE38NmRnY3RxUJ1u:000000000000000000000000000000000000009m/up
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/ZMy5ICPBd9ZK-VjxbWnzQ_vsOkw
Subject: Re: [dane] email canonicalization for SMIMEA owner names
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 22:50:54 -0000

>>>>> "VD" == Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> writes:

VD> The presence of the associated SRV records would signal adoption
VD> of the protocol.

The only issue with using SRV is that the http GET path would have to be
standardized, which could be an pain if the advertized MXs already serve
https for something else.

An NAPTR RR, OTOH, can specify an arbitrary URL.

-JimC
-- 
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6