Re: [dane] WGLC: DANE-SRV & DANE-SMTP

Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com> Mon, 08 December 2014 20:34 UTC

Return-Path: <shuque@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 378FA1ACE29 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:34:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3PfI3RJ60NxW for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:34:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x233.google.com (mail-ig0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57BF61ACE27 for <dane@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:34:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f179.google.com with SMTP id r2so3456846igi.6 for <dane@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 12:34:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=nIpg7SpMyYMZexVtRhQtXvq3VikUedKumcVzSaws/zc=; b=PJD8ixeNdeDVMYccIv7707Q1pDwULEDtedggLak56LytL8wLxR+CDoozxh2/kS0/yO LhJAFGThO5oA1ELFoDwZCIIPwfJuLYqgzAFAu4IaidXmEOUPR6pVmZnpoLt9mCdfO4GU Y/gVTEZh6hqx7pxuGo9Nqq9h5fTeJicbp1HigLTeg/+BhkHIOCX5urAYxCVxLfC+VP0x NobnEq9AYuCDcVY2JOBB+aYNNtes7fNHXYstaihVAD+GvwNdctXqodDVYsN1uHz/2GT8 Nhy+QpCKarYNwQiVpJI8YLK5yL/L87uHcFH6gURs4EJyWjc5q5NCqGweJPMlFikt0N2A /ghA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.4.102 with SMTP id j6mr16547984igj.37.1418070885308; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 12:34:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.225.196 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:34:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2B97DD9A-149D-43CB-9B5B-1860731F767C@isoc.org>
References: <0DAFC2A8-A1E2-46F4-BA52-E8261CB09159@ogud.com> <DAEF080F-7AD1-46F6-8C33-F4E7CCC5C0B5@ogud.com> <6F20D61B-DB10-4ECA-9447-3A8DFD7137DA@vpnc.org> <2B97DD9A-149D-43CB-9B5B-1860731F767C@isoc.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 15:34:45 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHPuVdX+HdmQqixS+PXZq7DrDRc0m9CFDuU5Brd_dpA+oYma+w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com>
To: Dan York <york@isoc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c31f6e62a14e0509ba5b2e
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/Zw5RzhOUeph2VjANnWC1DZikrfE
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, "<dane@ietf.org>" <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] WGLC: DANE-SRV & DANE-SMTP
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: shuque@gmail.com
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 20:34:49 -0000

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Dan York <york@isoc.org> wrote:

>  Olafur & Warren,
>
>  I realize that WGLC formally ended on Friday, but I'll note that I have
> read these two documents and I didn't really much beyond comments that
> Stephane and Viktor have already made. I support the documents moving ahead
> subject to the comments that have been sent around.
>
>  In https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dane-srv-08  I have these two
> comments:
>
> [...]
>
>  2. Where is 'Certificate Usage "DANE-EE"' defined?  I see it referenced
> here in section 4.2 but I don't find any reference to "DANE-EE" in RFC 6698
> or find a definition in this document?
>

DANE parameter abbreviations are defined in RFC 7218. The draft mentions
that it references those in Section 2 Terminology.

Shumon