[dane] How should draft-hoffman-dane-smime be written?

[Paul Hoffman <[e-mail]>]

Greetings again. As those of you who were at the IETF meeting in Vancouver (or those who read the minutes at http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/minutes/minutes-84-dane) know, Jakob and I are unsure about how the WG might want our draft to look. The current version of the draft expires in a few days, so we have an opportunity to make major changes now.

From our presentation:
What should be in the doc?
1.  Copy whole DANE-for-TLS RFC and make needed changes
2.  Copy structure of DANE-for-TLS RFC and point to it but don’t copy much
3.  Say “we assume you read and understood DANE-for-TLS, and here are the relevant differences”

If the WG can come to rough consensus in the next few days, we'll try to get the changes in before the doc expires; otherwise, we'll do an uninteresting bump draft and make the content changes later.

--Paul hoffman