IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] List of incidents that DANE would have blocked?

William Stouder-Studenmund <wrstuden@mac.com> Thu, 02 October 2014 17:21 UTC

Return-Path: <wrstuden@mac.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FED01A8A23 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 10:21:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.412
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.412 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MALFORMED_FREEMAIL=1.487, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zMcIW-s3XJ1D for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 10:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mr11p24im-asmtp002.me.com (mr11p24im-asmtp002.me.com [17.110.78.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 240011A8A1F for <dane@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 10:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [17.114.110.91] (unknown [17.114.110.91]) by mr11p24im-asmtp002.me.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.10(7.0.4.27.9) 64bit (built Jun 6 2014)) with ESMTPSA id <0NCT00L6MUVE1670@mr11p24im-asmtp002.me.com> for dane@ietf.org; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 17:21:29 +0000 (GMT)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52,1.0.28,0.0.0000 definitions=2014-10-02_05:2014-10-02,2014-10-02,1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1410020170
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_41F9EE18-04A2-4CB8-9609-3390DC27B299"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1985.3\))
From: William Stouder-Studenmund <wrstuden@mac.com>
In-reply-to: <87DFEBA9-634D-4D91-BCD6-58F48BDC60B7@ogud.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 10:21:28 -0700
Message-id: <D9C6E262-F026-4087-9B19-3342817614CE@mac.com>
References: <DD18BA26-107D-4584-ACDE-131DD3D45AE6@mac.com> <87DFEBA9-634D-4D91-BCD6-58F48BDC60B7@ogud.com>
To: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1985.3)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/dzagnD2V6SEp0QGver8gviyZ4W8
Cc: dane@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dane] List of incidents that DANE would have blocked?
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 17:21:31 -0000

> On Oct 1, 2014, at 11:03 PM, Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> wrote:
> 
> Bill, 
> short answer. 
> 
> Dane is about placing high value information in the DNS, 
> with out DNSSEC that is non-sensical. 
> 
> Yes we had this discussion a long time ago (most of second half of  2011), the deciding point was around November 2011. 
> starting with this message: 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/current/msg03748.html
> 
> and this one is a followup to gather consensus
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/current/msg03864.html <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/current/msg03864.html>
Thank you!

Take care,

Bill

v2.9.2 | Report a Bug | By Email