Re: [dane] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dane-smime-15: (with COMMENT)

Ólafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> Thu, 16 March 2017 13:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79FA1294EC; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:36:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.696
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.796, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0SCYjUnK3Tqe; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:36:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp100.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (smtp100.iad3a.emailsrvr.com [173.203.187.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 317591294E4; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:36:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp37.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp37.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 37DF33ECD; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:36:41 -0400 (EDT)
X-Auth-ID: ogud@ogud.com
Received: by smtp37.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: ogud-AT-ogud.com) with ESMTPSA id 6C48F5E41; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:36:29 -0400 (EDT)
X-Sender-Id: ogud@ogud.com
Received: from [26.54.226.93] ([UNAVAILABLE]. [172.56.7.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:465 (trex/5.7.12); Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:36:41 -0400
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 13:02:35 +0100
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <148963019657.14225.13317445344804850643.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <148963019657.14225.13317445344804850643.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----RGYJEDINVJ9VH7VC3CQRQ0TFV3QRL8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>,The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: draft-ietf-dane-smime@ietf.org,dane-chairs@ietf.org,dane@ietf.org
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D3lafur_Gudmundsson?= <ogud@ogud.com>
Message-ID: <B5764A79-9662-4A43-80C5-756CAC4942A1@ogud.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/gyPkGGX44W0OCbKLsGx5ayTRcq8>
Subject: Re: [dane] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dane-smime-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 13:36:46 -0000

The working group discussed this and decided to move forward. 


Ólafur

On March 16, 2017 3:09:56 AM GMT+01:00, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>; wrote:
>Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
>draft-ietf-dane-smime-15: No Objection
>
>When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>Please refer to
>https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
>The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-smime/
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>COMMENT:
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>There's a rather icky IPR disclosure that basically says that licensing
>terms won't be disclosed until they see where the draft is going. The
>shepherd's review doesn't mention whether the working group discussed
>that. Since this is experimental, it probably doesn't matter very much
>right now. I hope that gets some discussion prior to any attempt to
>promote this work to standards track.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.