Re: [dane] Behavior in the face of no answer?

[Paul Wouters <[e-mail]>]

On Mon, 14 May 2012, Eric Rescorla wrote:

> What we're discussing now
> (at the chair's request) is how to characterize the security implications
> of that implementation choice.

I understand that, but the proposed text is trying to define certain
states that are distinguishable to give different advise, and I tried
to show that one cannot distinguish some of those states. You cannot tell
implementarors that "indeterminate" is different from "bogus", and
that a browser can give different feedback depending on those two
states. Not from a security context anyways.

I'll try come up with an alternative text.

Paul