Re: [dane] S/MIME draft
Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Tue, 26 August 2014 18:45 UTC
Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 612841A0195 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.668
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.668 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LiFIsxIcOOFr for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:45:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 822881A0089 for <dane@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:45:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4600D82E12; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:45:39 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1409078739; bh=9GD0U2K60QUTIh/Eb1hMPvJEWU7o6hCOzzwpR6cmkho=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=MopjNu0I5dXtqQFv7IcgF4bBN6/Hmhss5j4H6j/+TU/o9vUPFmshXT/rKv4dBpmDu 0KT+A7xkKMWgXAZxgGQqOI/PiPafki8E4EeGjIGlQtdPZNKh2UAc2ac4svxBLd20o6 he8dUQuFqo2jqcZjKy5Y/wLDYhiRftTLdsFwAgzI=
Received: from localhost (paul@localhost) by bofh.nohats.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id s7QIjdJS001009; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:45:39 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: bofh.nohats.ca: paul owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:45:38 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: "Rose, Scott" <scott.rose@nist.gov>
In-Reply-To: <699D1F51-00F3-4DD4-9D62-2307DC3B4582@nist.gov>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1408261443310.524@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <CE2072BD-39C8-42FE-B08D-7930667D5DEC@verisign.com> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1408261110540.28003@bofh.nohats.ca> <699D1F51-00F3-4DD4-9D62-2307DC3B4582@nist.gov>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/ldXIReMKpvNsn6OpAZYu-B7qTyQ
Cc: dane WG list <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] S/MIME draft
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:45:42 -0000
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014, Rose, Scott wrote: > Noted - the requirements are for capabilities, so maybe "protocol" is a bad choice of words. This draft is to start to flesh out requirements and get the discussion going with the goal to improve the SMIMEA draft, or other drafts. So it is an smime-dane-usage draft? Similar to: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-usage-00 I'm not sure if this new document and that one should be merged or not. There will be similar concerns but also very different concerns. Paul
- [dane] S/MIME draft Osterweil, Eric
- Re: [dane] S/MIME draft Paul Wouters
- Re: [dane] S/MIME draft Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dane] S/MIME draft Paul Wouters
- Re: [dane] S/MIME draft Osterweil, Eric
- Re: [dane] S/MIME draft Rose, Scott
- Re: [dane] S/MIME draft Rose, Scott
- Re: [dane] S/MIME draft Osterweil, Eric