Re: [dane] Enterprise email security reqs breakdown: REQ7 (signing/encryption certs)
"Osterweil, Eric" <eosterweil@verisign.com> Mon, 08 September 2014 13:53 UTC
Return-Path: <eosterweil@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 608491A8830 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 06:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NZmKh3p92V4u for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 06:52:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod6og118.obsmtp.com (exprod6og118.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 356201A8831 for <dane@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 06:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from osprey.verisign.com ([216.168.239.75]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob118.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKVA20uRl7IyNx/MkfpFhYakrqQI3Q84DI@postini.com; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 06:52:58 PDT
Received: from brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.205]) by osprey.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id s88Dqvx4006074 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 8 Sep 2014 09:52:57 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 09:52:56 -0400
From: "Osterweil, Eric" <eosterweil@verisign.com>
To: "Rose, Scott" <scott.rose@nist.gov>
Thread-Topic: [dane] Enterprise email security reqs breakdown: REQ7 (signing/encryption certs)
Thread-Index: AQHPx6Gv/dJnikS3MEKt0CG6PuebyZv3jD+A
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 13:52:56 +0000
Message-ID: <8742EF43-2504-4AB9-9E38-03C20613DA18@verisign.com>
References: <4ED17ED7-C9CC-40D8-A9B8-F46860A1D831@nist.gov>
In-Reply-To: <4ED17ED7-C9CC-40D8-A9B8-F46860A1D831@nist.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0B133A8B-F5C5-4469-BFE6-E4C239BCAECD"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/m-bD2ueQEHEDk_IUXnslro8IbIQ
Cc: dane WG list <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] Enterprise email security reqs breakdown: REQ7 (signing/encryption certs)
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 13:53:00 -0000
On Sep 3, 2014, at 2:05 PM, "Rose, Scott" <scott.rose@nist.gov> wrote: <snip> > Questions: > > 1. is this requirement reasonable? I believe it is. > 2. (if reasonable): Is the strawman text adequate? Should another method be used other than a naming convention such as a different RRTYPE or usage field? We have found this quite useful in our coding, fwiw. Eric
- [dane] Enterprise email security reqs breakdown: … Rose, Scott
- Re: [dane] Enterprise email security reqs breakdo… Osterweil, Eric