Re: [dane] S/MIME draft
"Rose, Scott" <scott.rose@nist.gov> Tue, 26 August 2014 19:25 UTC
Return-Path: <scott.rose@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C5F1A00DC for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:25:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vZFuueUOCyq7 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2lp0207.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.207]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 796861A01DC for <dane@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLUPR09MB117.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.255.213.14) by BLUPR09MB118.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.255.213.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1015.19; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:25:45 +0000
Received: from BLUPR09MB117.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.213.14]) by BLUPR09MB117.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.213.14]) with mapi id 15.00.1015.018; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:25:44 +0000
From: "Rose, Scott" <scott.rose@nist.gov>
To: dane WG list <dane@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dane] S/MIME draft
Thread-Index: AQHPwTzSp2zLy/0IwEiIGXszYmLFzpvjAIoAgAApbQCAAA9qAIAACzIA
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:25:44 +0000
Message-ID: <F88FCB0E-CC0B-4994-BA01-5E1898C43A42@nist.gov>
References: <CE2072BD-39C8-42FE-B08D-7930667D5DEC@verisign.com> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1408261110540.28003@bofh.nohats.ca> <699D1F51-00F3-4DD4-9D62-2307DC3B4582@nist.gov> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1408261443310.524@bofh.nohats.ca>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1408261443310.524@bofh.nohats.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [129.6.140.6]
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;UriScan:;
x-forefront-prvs: 03152A99FF
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(6009001)(51704005)(199003)(189002)(24454002)(377454003)(85306004)(46102001)(64706001)(99396002)(74502001)(93886004)(107886001)(15202345003)(95666004)(33656002)(76482001)(50986999)(74662001)(31966008)(77982001)(4396001)(36756003)(21056001)(76176999)(83716003)(107046002)(54356999)(20776003)(79102001)(81342001)(99286002)(80022001)(106356001)(106116001)(81542001)(83322001)(87936001)(19580405001)(105586002)(19580395003)(92726001)(92566001)(86362001)(110136001)(85852003)(66066001)(90102001)(2656002)(15975445006)(101416001)(83072002)(82746002)(104396001); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR09MB118; H:BLUPR09MB117.namprd09.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:3; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <BE1EC3529D9E6149AE798DEB4A1662FE@namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nist.gov
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/nJCPh5yMPRxAqoBeIHsynrYsP68
Subject: Re: [dane] S/MIME draft
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:25:51 -0000
On Aug 26, 2014, at 2:45 PM, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2014, Rose, Scott wrote: > >> Noted - the requirements are for capabilities, so maybe "protocol" is a bad choice of words. This draft is to start to flesh out requirements and get the discussion going with the goal to improve the SMIMEA draft, or other drafts. > > So it is an smime-dane-usage draft? Similar to: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-usage-00 > > I'm not sure if this new document and that one should be merged or not. > There will be similar concerns but also very different concerns. > Possibly, but it would require some work. Or else there would be a SMIMEA and SMIMEA-usage documents as the result. In effect, a mirror of the OPENPGPKEY and its usage document pair. Scott > Paul =================================== Scott Rose NIST scott.rose@nist.gov +1 301-975-8439 Google Voice: +1 571-249-3671 http://www.dnsops.gov/ ===================================
- [dane] S/MIME draft Osterweil, Eric
- Re: [dane] S/MIME draft Paul Wouters
- Re: [dane] S/MIME draft Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dane] S/MIME draft Paul Wouters
- Re: [dane] S/MIME draft Osterweil, Eric
- Re: [dane] S/MIME draft Rose, Scott
- Re: [dane] S/MIME draft Rose, Scott
- Re: [dane] S/MIME draft Osterweil, Eric