Re: [dane] DNS errors text

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 02 October 2014 02:13 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5321A8882 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 19:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GrmPQjFAalhO for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 19:13:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D631F1A887A for <dane@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 19:13:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (142-254-17-87.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.17.87]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s922DIRg028223 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Oct 2014 19:13:20 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 142-254-17-87.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.17.87] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <542CB20B.4020803@andyet.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 19:13:17 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7D2E911A-9D78-4242-A61D-7704DE4A60D4@vpnc.org>
References: <542CB20B.4020803@andyet.net>
To: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/nLnf4FccWMGghhbxNCw6nUJcltE
Cc: "<dane@ietf.org>" <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] DNS errors text
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 02:13:25 -0000

On Oct 1, 2014, at 7:01 PM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> wrote:

> Section 2.1 of draft-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane has some thorough text on DNS errors. Viktor suggested that draft-ietf-dane-srv needs the same text. I would strongly prefer NOT to have the same text in two documents for various reasons. When I mentioned this to the chairs, they suggested moving the text from the SMTP document to the SRV document since it is more generic. I don't really care where it lives, I just want it to be in one place. What do WG participants think?

As long as the SMTP document points to the SRV document for the errors, it's fine to have it live in the SRV document.

--Paul Hoffman