[dane] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-york-dane-deployment-observations-00.txt

Dan York <york@isoc.org> Mon, 27 October 2014 22:56 UTC

Return-Path: <york@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CBFE1A19E4 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 15:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I5KO7qoQwjFV for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 15:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0099.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9929F1A1BF0 for <dane@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 15:55:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLUPR06MB243.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.191.154) by BLUPR06MB244.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.191.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.6.9; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 22:55:31 +0000
Received: from BLUPR06MB243.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.7.249]) by BLUPR06MB243.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.7.249]) with mapi id 15.01.0006.000; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 22:55:31 +0000
From: Dan York <york@isoc.org>
To: IETF DANE Mailinglist <dane@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-york-dane-deployment-observations-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHP8jjOFMsq3jadb06FZXJoaiV9rA==
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 22:55:31 +0000
Message-ID: <F0C0FC32-FAA7-4D07-A230-59A538754BCD@isoc.org>
References: <20141027225310.29285.24437.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [2604:6000:9fc0:53:801e:5527:2cfe:8df6]
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR06MB244;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-forefront-prvs: 0377802854
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(979002)(377454003)(2473001)(377424004)(199003)(189002)(82746002)(19580405001)(95666004)(77096002)(16601075003)(15975445006)(83716003)(101416001)(19580395003)(50986999)(120916001)(99286002)(99396003)(230783001)(21056001)(16236675004)(14971765001)(87936001)(76482002)(40100003)(122556002)(85306004)(85852003)(15202345003)(54356999)(92566001)(92726001)(19617315012)(107886001)(64706001)(107046002)(2656002)(110136001)(31966008)(46102003)(36756003)(106356001)(33656002)(97736003)(4396001)(106116001)(80022003)(86362001)(105586002)(20776003)(76176999)(104396001)(3826002)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR06MB244; H:BLUPR06MB243.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F0C0FC32FAA74D07A23059A538754BCDisocorg_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: isoc.org
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/yyPStDhVbDz_SwmVAiOmBViURec
Subject: [dane] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-york-dane-deployment-observations-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 22:56:08 -0000

Since I had put in a request for agenda time at IETF 91 to potentially talk about if there were any lessons from DANE deployment that could be fed back into the standards process, I did throw together a quick draft...

Feedback is very definitely welcome... I'm not intending anything with this document other than using it as a catalyst for discussions.

Dan


Begin forwarded message:

From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org<mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>>
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-york-dane-deployment-observations-00.txt
Date: October 27, 2014 6:53:10 PM EDT
To: Dan York <york@isoc.org<mailto:york@isoc.org>>, "york@isoc.org<mailto:york@isoc.org>" <york@isoc.org<mailto:york@isoc.org>>


A new version of I-D, draft-york-dane-deployment-observations-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Dan York and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name: draft-york-dane-deployment-observations
Revision: 00
Title: DANE Deployment Observations
Document date: 2014-10-27
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 4
URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-york-dane-deployment-observations-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-york-dane-deployment-observations/
Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-york-dane-deployment-observations-00


Abstract:
  This document provides some observations about the deployment of the
  DANE protocol to date and some questions for discussion on the DANE
  mailing list and potentially at the IETF 91 meeting of the DANE
  Working Group.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org<http://tools.ietf.org>.

The IETF Secretariat