Re: [Danish] Proposed WG Charter

On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 4:14 PM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:

> On 13 Jun 2021, at 16:04, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> > I see this as a sticking point.
> > Those who like DNSSEC will dislike working around it.
> > Those who think DNSSEC will never sail will use this to sink it.
>
> If the charter of this WG is to sink DNSSEC, that needs to be stated
> explicitly in the charter, and then say why this work should not be in
> other PKI-based WGs.
>

This charter proposes the creation of an easier adoption path for DNS-based
identities, which includes DNSSEC. I don't think anyone here wants to sink
DNSSEC.

> >     > I think the charter should go some way to clarifying the
> > intended use
> >     > cases.
> >
> > I think that's actually more than a charter should say.
>
> I could not disagree more strongly.
>
> > The charter needs to specific enough to tell people if they are
> > interested in
> > the problem, and motivate them enough to read a use case document.
>
> Charters are not documents to attract participants, they are
> descriptions of intended work. Given that this thread has brought out
> some significant disagreements on the use cases, the listing of use
> cases is all that much more imperative.
>
> --Paul Hoffman
>
> --
> Danish mailing list
> Danish@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/danish
>

-- 

*Ash Wilson* | Technical Director
*e:* ash.wilson@valimail.com

This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.