Re: [Danish] DANISH BOF introductory email

"Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net> Fri, 12 February 2021 09:41 UTC

Return-Path: <oej@edvina.net>
X-Original-To: danish@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: danish@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA0C3A14B4 for <danish@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 01:41:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z_gQwgJbDXcb for <danish@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 01:41:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp7.webway.se (smtp7.webway.se [IPv6:2a02:920:212e::205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73D163A14B2 for <danish@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 01:41:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pinguicula.webway.org (h-205-16.A165.corp.bahnhof.se [176.10.205.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp7.webway.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5ACB425F2; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:41:24 +0100 (CET)
From: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net>
Message-Id: <17AAD333-9985-4B98-A7C4-8BF9FD446E51@edvina.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2D7C7CCD-1BF1-4C30-862D-97595588EA22"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:41:19 +0100
In-Reply-To: <22126.1613091105@localhost>
Cc: Olle E Johansson <oej@edvina.net>, danish@ietf.org
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
References: <16827.1611948402@localhost> <ybl4kiz8m8h.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <8243.1612384217@localhost> <yblzh0imo9n.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <13345.1612653678@localhost> <yblczx6jg2t.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <22126.1613091105@localhost>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/danish/_cRxN5ZOiIeQHhZrvFckgaMCSHc>
Subject: Re: [Danish] DANISH BOF introductory email
X-BeenThere: danish@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <danish.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/danish>, <mailto:danish-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/danish/>
List-Post: <mailto:danish@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:danish-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/danish>, <mailto:danish-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:41:35 -0000


> On 12 Feb 2021, at 01:51, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> Signed PGP part
> 
> Hi, there are some 30+ people subscribed to the DANISH list now from a wide
> variety of organizations.  We should start!
> 
> The BOF has been approved (the only one, I think, for IETF110), and is
> scheduled for the Friday Session I (at 12:00 UTC).
Great!

> 
> The BOF chairs are Wes Hardaker and Michael Richardson.
> This non-WG forming BOF was created after the secdispatch discussion at IETF109.
> Some organizational meetings with the ADs and proponents will occur next
> week, and I expect that this will result in a draft agenda being posted.
> 
> We have added:
> 1.draft-huque-dane-client-cert-05
>   TLS Client Authentication via DANE TLSA records
> 2.draft-huque-tls-dane-clientid-04
>   TLS Extension for DANE Client Identity
> to the list of documents at https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/danish/documents/
> 
> It is possible that there are other documents on the Datatracker which are relevant!
> Please point the list to them.
> 
> There are perhaps other documents which are yet-to-be-submitted which should
> also be considered.  If you are working on something but you aren't quite
> ready to submit it, then please let the BOF chairs know that something is
> coming.
> 
> The secdispatch meetecho record which led to this BOF can be reviewed at:
>    https://youtu.be/vA2P4EkNCIQ?t=3863
> 
> A key goal of the upcoming BOF is to establish a clear problem statement.
> 
> Two areas of problem statement were mentioned in the secdispatch and
> in draft-huque-dane-client-cert, namely:
>  a) IoT device authentication.
>  b) SMTP client authentication.

I have some ideas for realtime communication - SIP and possibly some
WebRTC implementations as well. Just loose ideas, based on my earlier
draft on SIP and DANE. Would be great if a vendor of SIP devices hooked on :-)

Also work with IoT device auth, so it’s my main interest here.

Thank you for your work in bringing it to BOF!

/O
> 
> The work is also presently very TLS specific.
> This is either a feature (well focused work), or a problem (desire to use it
> for object security).  Your comments and thoughts welcome.
> 
> BOF-co-chairs.
> Wes + Michael
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>