[Danish] Revised charter based on recent discussions

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Sun, 18 July 2021 22:21 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: danish@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: danish@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A584E3A1160 for <danish@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 15:21:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kl9hkBDWm0tf for <danish@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 15:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5248A3A1164 for <danish@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 15:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.1.0.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A88E224E88 for <danish@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 15:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: danish@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 15:21:38 -0700
Message-ID: <yblmtqjntzh.fsf@wx.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/danish/tnal68lULToFCfyiSIybT9pf5BA>
Subject: [Danish] Revised charter based on recent discussions
X-BeenThere: danish@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DANE AutheNtication for Iot Service Hardening <danish.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/danish>, <mailto:danish-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/danish/>
List-Post: <mailto:danish@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:danish-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/danish>, <mailto:danish-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 22:21:48 -0000

Folks,

We are scheduled to have a BOF during IETF 111.  Since there has been
only a few messages indicating support for the creation of the WG and
the charter, we'll likely be having a charter discussion rather than
getting real work done on clearly identifying the architecture and
corresponding problem space (bullet 1 of the charter items).

I've updated my copy of the charter in my github page [1], based on
recent wording concerns and submitted a PR #6 [2] to MCR's github
repository.  Reviews appreciated, and more importantly: concrete changes
you would like to make (OLD/NEW or PRs or ...).

Finally, if you think this space is something the IETF should take on we
certainly need to hear more from people that believe this is an
important problem to be solved, and if so how you're willing to help.
(but even if you aren't committing to help, we at least need people that
want to participate in discussions to say so).  Silence, in the IETF,
does not achieve consensus :-/

[1] https://github.com/hardaker/danish-bof/tree/2021-07-18-charter-revision
[2] https://github.com/mcr/danish-bof/pull/6

-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI