IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dart] Commentary on draft-york-00

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 12 June 2014 14:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dart@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dart@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB9A1A01EB for <dart@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 07:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1eywgtHEmq1y for <dart@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 07:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AAF31B29A9 for <dart@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 07:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.23] (cpe-173-172-146-58.tx.res.rr.com [173.172.146.58]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s5CEPsvu044619 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Jun 2014 09:25:57 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-173-172-146-58.tx.res.rr.com [173.172.146.58] claimed to be [10.0.1.23]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <5399A1C8.7080407@alvestrand.no>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 09:25:53 -0500
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 424275953.4938-51f376a6275dd767217305bb4dd052ee
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2996CB73-E2E5-4AE9-B602-A5466FD8C445@nostrum.com>
References: <5399A1C8.7080407@alvestrand.no>
To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dart/2YNX1nrN_OX3_BR_KqoF3h97fxI
Cc: dart@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dart] Commentary on draft-york-00
X-BeenThere: dart@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"DiffServ Applied to RTP Transports discussion list\"" <dart.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dart>, <mailto:dart-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dart/>
List-Post: <mailto:dart@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dart-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dart>, <mailto:dart-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:26:17 -0000

Thanks Harald! I want to hit one particular comment:

On Jun 12, 2014, at 7:49 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:

[...]

> "SCTP ... can be multiplexed with one or more RTP sessions". Actually we can only multiplex SCTP with a single RTP session. There have been proposals that would allow multiplexing of multiple RTP sessions (each containing multiple media flows) over a single 5-tuple, but these were not accepted.
> 
> 

[...]

> In bullet 2, only one RTP session can be multiplexed with another transport protocol (again).

[...]

Is this a matter of proper definitions of "RTP Session" vs "Media Flow"? (i.e. properly naming the thing that can be multiplexed?) Or is there a technical misunderstanding?

Ben.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email