Re: [Dart] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-00.txt

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Tue, 05 August 2014 19:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dart@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dart@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DCDD1A0149 for <dart@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 12:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o3NfOK5ugywB for <dart@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 12:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE1641A014A for <dart@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 12:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.23] (cpe-173-172-146-58.tx.res.rr.com [173.172.146.58]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s75JeiiK095035 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Aug 2014 14:40:48 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-173-172-146-58.tx.res.rr.com [173.172.146.58] claimed to be [10.0.1.23]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712077860E55C@MX15A.corp.emc.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 14:40:44 -0500
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 428960444.403094-1177972c2c9b2980777a01adeddaf89d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5024D1F3-242E-43BF-9572-4C72669EFBB6@nostrum.com>
References: <20140731190738.16865.76561.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712077860E55C@MX15A.corp.emc.com>
To: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dart/Ih-gDHdtgekJJ5k_M8NPqh60H50
Cc: "dart@ietf.org" <dart@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dart] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dart@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"DiffServ Applied to RTP Transports discussion list\"" <dart.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dart>, <mailto:dart-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dart/>
List-Post: <mailto:dart@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dart-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dart>, <mailto:dart-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 19:40:57 -0000

(as individual)

-- General

I concur with the editor's note to reorganize sections. On my first reading, I was going to comment that I thought we needed more focus on what is really likely to happen, e.g. with WebRTC. On a second reading, I think that's mostly okay, but the consolidation of the RTP sections might make it more clear.

-- Section 4, Bullets 3 and 4:

Should STP in bullet 4 be SCTP? If yes, then doesn't this bullet more tightly constrain things than bullet 3, to the point of making bullet 3 redundant? Or am I misreading something?

Thanks!

Ben.

On Jul 31, 2014, at 3:50 PM, Black, David <david.black@emc.com> wrote:

> As promised, here's the -00 dart WG draft.  I think I incorporated almost
> everything that was discussed in the meeting, but I've surely missed a
> few things - please comment (on list, or send me editorial changes directly).
> 
> I want to call attention to this Editor's Note on draft organization:
> 
>   [Editor's Note: Current section structure skips around topics
>   somewhat.  The editor suggests restructuring to put real-time/RTP
>   material first (new section 2, consisting of current sections 2, 2.1
>   and 3), then DiffServ Background (new section 3, consisting of
>   current sections 2.2, 2.3, 2.6 and 2.7, followed by discussion of
>   interactions (new section 4, consisting of current sections 2.4, 2.5
>   and 5) and guidelines (current section 4, renumbered to new section
>   5).]
> 
> If this change is made, I will submit a version that only contains the
> text rearrangement before making any other changes.  The "game plan" that
> I've discussed w/Ben (WG chair) is to revise the draft over about the next
> week with the resulting version going to WG Last Call, so reading this
> draft sooner rather than later might be a good idea.
> 
> Thanks,
> --David
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> internet-drafts@ietf.org
>> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 3:08 PM
>> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
>> Cc: dart@ietf.org
>> Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-00.txt
>> 
>> 
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the DiffServ Applied to Real-time Transports
>> Working Group of the IETF.
>> 
>>        Title           : Differentiated Services (DiffServ) and Real-time
>> Communication
>>        Authors         : David Black
>>                          Paul Jones
>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-00.txt
>> 	Pages           : 23
>> 	Date            : 2014-07-31
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>   This document describes the interaction between Differentiated
>>   Services (DiffServ) network quality of service (QoS) functionality
>>   and real-time network communication, including communication based on
>>   the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP).  DiffServ is based on network
>>   nodes applying different forwarding treatments to packets whose IP
>>   headers are marked with different DiffServ Code Points (DSCPs).  As a
>>   result, use of different DSCPs within a single traffic stream may
>>   cause transport protocol interactions (e.g., reordering).  In
>>   addition, DSCP markings may be changed or removed between the traffic
>>   source and destination.  This document covers the implications of
>>   these DiffServ aspects for real-time network communication, including
>>   RTCWEB.
>> 
>> 
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp/
>> 
>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-00
>> 
>> 
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>> 
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> I-D-Announce mailing list
>> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
>> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
>> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dart mailing list
> Dart@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dart