Re: [Dart] draft-dart-dscp-rtp - way forward

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 28 August 2014 19:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dart@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dart@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B426C1A0193 for <dart@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.568
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.568 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fKwEum87zCK7 for <dart@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8529B1A897F for <dart@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.23] (cpe-173-172-146-58.tx.res.rr.com [173.172.146.58]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s7SJi2QM065153 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Aug 2014 14:44:03 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-173-172-146-58.tx.res.rr.com [173.172.146.58] claimed to be [10.0.1.23]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712077BC667DE@MX15A.corp.emc.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 14:44:01 -0500
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 430947841.504436-52e951b8f28ed9358cbd8d7429dc5379
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2B82DD06-83A4-4710-B614-16F5351A0A7F@nostrum.com>
References: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712077BC667DE@MX15A.corp.emc.com>
To: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>, Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dart/PH8M9P3nBd4U5uQO6-XM-yhg4d8
Cc: "dart@ietf.org" <dart@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dart] draft-dart-dscp-rtp - way forward
X-BeenThere: dart@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"DiffServ Applied to RTP Transports discussion list\"" <dart.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dart>, <mailto:dart-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dart/>
List-Post: <mailto:dart@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dart-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dart>, <mailto:dart-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 19:44:26 -0000

(as chair)

On Aug 28, 2014, at 1:12 PM, Black, David <david.black@emc.com>; wrote:

> [E] Open issue: Harald Alvestrand's concerns about "differential treatment"
> wrt Section 5.1 .  I don't completely understand these concerns, and suspect
> that they may require an email discussion across the DART and RMCAT WGs
> to sort through.
> 
> --> Deferred - Harald wanted to think about this, and I've seen nothing
> --> further.  I'd suggest that IETF Last Call as an appropriate opportunity
> --> to share any further thoughts, so I don't think there's anything to be done
> --> about this now.

I have mixed feelings on this.

If we think we can close this as not a real issue (or at least not an issue we plan to address), but there's some risk it might come back up at IETF LC, then that's fine. But if we are saying there is an open issue that needs closure, but we can close it during IETF last call, then I have reservations. The version that goes to IETF LC should be one that the working group believes to be as complete is it's going to get.

David, thoughts?

Harald, do you care to comment further?