Re: [datatracker-rqmts] Community Datatracker draft -02

"Jim Schaad" <ietf@augustcellars.com> Mon, 22 November 2010 07:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: datatracker-rqmts@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: datatracker-rqmts@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004963A6A0E for <datatracker-rqmts@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:18:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.486
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.486 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.114, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 96pY-RcHlQuq for <datatracker-rqmts@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:18:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp1.pacifier.net (smtp1.pacifier.net [64.255.237.171]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D32B3A6952 for <datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:18:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TITUS (unknown [207.202.179.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jimsch@nwlink.com) by smtp1.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE706EF4A; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:19:23 -0800 (PST)
From: "Jim Schaad" <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: "'Paul Hoffman'" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, <datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org>
References: <069201cb84a5$f3600e60$da202b20$@augustcellars.com> <4CE18751.7030002@gmail.com> <001f01cb8541$cbe593e0$63b0bba0$@augustcellars.com> <p06240802c90f9c1d813c@[10.20.30.150]>
In-Reply-To: <p06240802c90f9c1d813c@[10.20.30.150]>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:32:34 -0800
Message-ID: <003101cb8a17$6faeaaf0$4f0c00d0$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGmhsIGnND7rj+Y3kZx1QsKT7FjIQKCUTwEAeo0jB8Cp4rtvZOOYp8A
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: Re: [datatracker-rqmts] Community Datatracker draft -02
X-BeenThere: datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <datatracker-rqmts.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/datatracker-rqmts>, <mailto:datatracker-rqmts-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/datatracker-rqmts>
List-Post: <mailto:datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:datatracker-rqmts-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/datatracker-rqmts>, <mailto:datatracker-rqmts-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 07:18:31 -0000

Paul,

Some responses to this document.

1.  Is there perhaps a requirement for some type of mathematics of the
lists?   We currently have unions - i.e. make me a list of lists.  I don't
know that I can think of any good reason to have intersections (i.e. in all
of the following lists), but I can think that the subtraction operation
might be very useful.  I care about everything that this working group does
EXCEPT for the following documents.

2.  In section 2.1.6, I am wondering if I can put a list instead of a
particular RFC or particular draft in some of the locations?  I.e. can I get
a list of all of the drafts/rfcs that are referenced by the drafts/rfcs in
this list?  I can see it as being useful for some type of background
processing.  I.e. I need to figure out which drafts or RFCs I might care
about reading because they relate to the current set of drafts that I am
tracking.

3.  Section 2.2.2 - This section does not match exactly what I remember from
the discussion.  I remember that it should be possible to create an atom
feed that specifies exactly which events are to be sent.  (OK - I see this
in the open issue list.)

4. In Section 2.3.1 - You have a requirement that the display should only
show a single draft once.  Does the same requirement also apply to the atom
and e-mail feeds?

5.  In section 2.3.3 - you talk about having the flag on a draft in a list.
Do you really mean list or view of a list?  What happens if you have
multiple flags because the draft appears in multiple lists?

6.  In appendix B - It might be better to have a set of "pre-defined" lists
that are owned by tools team (or some such group) that contain the set of
good pre-defined lists that people want to see.  Such as: 
  WG - Std track documents
  WG - Non-std track documents
  WG - Agenda documents for next meeting.
  ....

Jim


> -----Original Message-----
> From: datatracker-rqmts-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:datatracker-rqmts-
> bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Paul Hoffman
> Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2010 8:08 PM
> To: datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org
> Subject: [datatracker-rqmts] Community Datatracker draft -02
> 
> Greetings again. As promised, I have made massive revisions (mostly
additions)
> to the draft based on the input at the BoF in Beijing and follow-up
discussion.
> The new draft can be found at
<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-
> genarea-datatracker-community-02.txt>.
> 
> It might have been silly for me to try to track all the changes in
Appendix D, but
> some of y'all might want to check that I hit all the points given during
the BoF.
> 
> All input is still welcome. At some point soon, I will start some focused
threads,
> but feel free to start your own.
> 
> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --VPN Consortium
> _______________________________________________
> datatracker-rqmts mailing list
> datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/datatracker-rqmts