Re: [datatracker-rqmts] New Requirement

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com> Mon, 15 November 2010 19:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@shinkuro.com>
X-Original-To: datatracker-rqmts@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: datatracker-rqmts@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD033A6D07 for <datatracker-rqmts@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:38:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.486
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.486 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.114, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bqklLTf4el3Z for <datatracker-rqmts@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:38:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (mail.yitter.info [208.86.224.201]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81963A6D0E for <datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:38:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crankycanuck.ca (69-196-144-230.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.144.230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CBD31ECB442 for <datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 19:39:05 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:39:02 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
To: datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20101115193902.GB322@shinkuro.com>
References: <069201cb84a5$f3600e60$da202b20$@augustcellars.com> <4CE18751.7030002@gmail.com> <p06240823c9073a421353@[10.20.30.150]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <p06240823c9073a421353@[10.20.30.150]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Subject: Re: [datatracker-rqmts] New Requirement
X-BeenThere: datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <datatracker-rqmts.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/datatracker-rqmts>, <mailto:datatracker-rqmts-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/datatracker-rqmts>
List-Post: <mailto:datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:datatracker-rqmts-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/datatracker-rqmts>, <mailto:datatracker-rqmts-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 19:38:24 -0000

On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:30:45AM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> That's not what Jim said. His example was some private data in the Datatracker.

I don't have time for a more detailed comment right now, but do we
really think it a good idea to be adding private data to the
datatracker?  Public systems with private data in them are mostly a
nightmare.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@shinkuro.com
Shinkuro, Inc.