Re: [datatracker-rqmts] Slides for the face-to-face BoF next week

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 03 November 2010 07:28 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: datatracker-rqmts@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: datatracker-rqmts@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB78A3A6A6A for <datatracker-rqmts@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 00:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.952
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.952 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.420, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cdDoaiZ9yCRK for <datatracker-rqmts@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 00:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 730A93A6A79 for <datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 00:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyb28 with SMTP id 28so304164wyb.31 for <datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=t2GPZPbPwrwpQri7jPUw3P+KtESbLBgY958mfHfw2hc=; b=A5pgDB82Ymi+Ojd2bpoA81nLGKHsFSZyz0QK6fJhoHPI9vyoyYHC0F5DqmpI/f85tM wRmCIu77g2fSWSUHDE17JGjOBcs1LdeIUGKgxvWtTx5L2ufW53btVVeYMgTXB4jZRG5P MdrXn5fKzQwM9y7udVC1bTP/9+ZcXa+4VLVD8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=PCnu9gBefk2srXeHcvrXMUF0se3fFd036c6llzc6PoU6F2BkZaVkLRoozcICZh4MfA 8LTgk61Rl/zoXjAtmj1Xs4VTFucmEVW3rUMUNTIZB2cnOsRo3afYwajIouGxykbAw1CN OPEz2cXecszrREnkYcAqjOmgQOdvgoyezM6Zw=
Received: by 10.227.152.21 with SMTP id e21mr17694145wbw.188.1288769333172; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.2] (bzq-79-181-26-165.red.bezeqint.net [79.181.26.165]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i19sm7139727wbe.17.2010.11.03.00.28.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4CD10F30.1050705@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 09:28:48 +0200
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org
References: <p06240800c8ecfbb84168@[10.20.30.249]> <p0624088ac8f4ef10b46d@[10.20.30.249]> <6.2.5.6.2.20101102074555.099f1830@resistor.net> <p06240894c8f5dde043db@[10.20.30.150]> <6.2.5.6.2.20101102110842.0a10f7c0@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20101102110842.0a10f7c0@resistor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: [datatracker-rqmts] Slides for the face-to-face BoF next week
X-BeenThere: datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <datatracker-rqmts.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/datatracker-rqmts>, <mailto:datatracker-rqmts-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/datatracker-rqmts>
List-Post: <mailto:datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:datatracker-rqmts-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/datatracker-rqmts>, <mailto:datatracker-rqmts-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 07:28:48 -0000

Reiterating and possibly clarifying what others have said in the past:

I think about 80% of this project is a waste of IETF resources.

I suggest that we concentrate ONLY on providing very granular Atom feeds 
for draft status changes, Then, we can leave everything else (graphic 
presentation, update periods, privacy, sharing) to the users. People can 
use desktop RSS readers, or the easier but more limited Web-based 
alternatives, e.g. Google Reader.

With the proposal on the table, what we're getting ourselves into is yet 
another enterprise-level Web application, with all that that involves. 
Yes, even Web application security.

Thanks,
	Yaron