Re: [datatracker-rqmts] Legal issues

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 17 December 2010 22:46 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: datatracker-rqmts@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: datatracker-rqmts@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B61A3A6A09 for <datatracker-rqmts@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:46:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.554
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.045, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kIzzUS1Ku104 for <datatracker-rqmts@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:46:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793893A69B8 for <datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:46:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DFB9A47B0; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:48:28 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A93HIe9hRA5m; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:48:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.2.110] (pool-96-231-58-190.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.231.58.190]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D009A47A3; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:48:27 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4D0BE8BB.7000301@vigilsec.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:48:27 -0500
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
References: <p06240800c8ecfbb84168@[10.20.30.249]> <p0624088ac8f4ef10b46d@[10.20.30.249]> <1515.198.180.150.230.1288715769.squirrel@mail.smetech.net> <p0624089ac8f5f383565e@[10.20.30.150]>
In-Reply-To: <p0624089ac8f5f383565e@[10.20.30.150]>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [datatracker-rqmts] Legal issues
X-BeenThere: datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <datatracker-rqmts.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/datatracker-rqmts>, <mailto:datatracker-rqmts-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/datatracker-rqmts>
List-Post: <mailto:datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:datatracker-rqmts-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/datatracker-rqmts>, <mailto:datatracker-rqmts-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 22:46:28 -0000

>>> Greetings again. I have uploaded the proposed slides for the BoF to the
>>> IETF site; see <http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/slides/iddtspec-0.pdf>;.
>>>
>>> Of course, it would be swell if people wanted to talk about any of the
>>> topics in the draft or proposed in the slides before the meeting. :-)
>>
>> What legal issues do you see if an account-based system is used?  The
>> community already uses wikis that require an account.  How is this
>> different?
> 
> It is not clear that it is different, but it might be. I don't know of any private information that can be kept on the IETF wikis, but we are talking here about private lists (unless folks agree with SM). If there is private information on the IETF wikis, has anyone asked "the IETF lawyers" about it?

I am unaware of private information on the wikis.

Russ