Re: [datatracker-rqmts] Tracking things other than drafts in lists

Thank you to Barry and Blake for responding. Other folks are strongly 
encouraged to do the same! :-)

On 1/18/11 11:07 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Greetings again. At the meeting in Beijing, many people in the room
> expressed interest in being able to track things other than just drafts.
> However, there was also a desire to keep the first round of this work
> simple. I would like to address those two now and see what folks on this
> list think should be done.
>
> Appendix A of the current draft lists the five non-draft things that I
> have heard requests to track:
> Tracking RFC Status Changes and Errata
> Tracking WG Charter Changes
> Tracking IANA Registry Changes
> Tracking Changes in the Liason Statement Directory
> Tracking Changes in Documents Outside the IETF Sphere
> We can add as many or as few of them as we want to the first round of
> the tool.
>
> I propose the following choices for the first round, although feel free
> to add your own:
>
> a) None of the above: just track drafts
>
> b) Add just "RFC Status Changes and Errata"
>
> c) Add them all
>
> In my mind, the logic behind (a) is "keep it as simple as possible", the
> logic behind (b) is "most IETFers care about RFC status and errata in
> their development work and their WG work", and the logic behind (c) is
> "this is all easy to do and people won't get confused if they have too
> many choices". You might have other reasons for preferring one over the
> others, or wanting some combination other than what is listed above.
>
> Comments are welcome.
> _______________________________________________
> datatracker-rqmts mailing list
> datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/datatracker-rqmts
>
>
>