Re: [datatracker-rqmts] Privacy of lists

Paul Hoffman <> Fri, 05 November 2010 22:31 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717213A695E for <>; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -98.141
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24=2.189, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fG-S8WPzJewx for <>; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (Hoffman.Proper.COM []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3983A695D for <>; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oA5MVdUG019184 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:31:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240829c8fb08d7af68@[]>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <p06240800c8ecfbb84168@[]> <p0624088ac8f4ef10b46d@[]> <> <p06240894c8f5dde043db@[]> <> <p0624080ac8f7387faf99@[]> <>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 06:31:37 -0700
To: SM <>
From: Paul Hoffman <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [datatracker-rqmts] Privacy of lists
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 22:31:30 -0000

At 1:16 AM -0700 11/5/10, SM wrote:
>Hi Paul,
>At 09:09 03-11-10, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>>Attempt at summarizing: you want people who use the new tool to have to be authenticated, and anyone can see which of the authenticated people created a list that refers to a draft. Yes?
>No.  If we go by the arguments put forward by Henrik, this is a non-issue.  If these lists works along the same lines as IETF mailing list, these lists would have to be open.

OK, I'll remove this from the presentation then. If you can think of words I can put in the draft to make it clear that these lists-of-drafts are not discussion lists, I can do that.

Of course, if Yaron's preferences are adopted, this will be a non-issue.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium