Re: [dbound] DBOUND and paths forward
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 24 May 2016 02:09 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8968712DC2F for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2016 19:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I9VYMIgaEmpP for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2016 19:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37EE512DC2B for <dbound@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2016 19:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 1242 invoked from network); 24 May 2016 02:09:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 24 May 2016 02:09:34 -0000
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 02:09:12 -0000
Message-ID: <20160524020912.54781.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dbound@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwbeWRLd8tF045xYn00FLH3Dm1u=DR3-Gjb7oot+GYEr6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/-y5h8GYPhHOuToUN4yfT9LGNhmI>
Cc: superuser@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [dbound] DBOUND and paths forward
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 02:09:36 -0000
>With that in mind, your co-chairs propose that we abandon any grand unified >theory of domain boundary evaluation and focus only on this email use >case. If there is a change of heart from other communities, or some >unifying idea does appear, we can re-evaluate our options at that time. >However, in the interests of being productive toward our original goals, we >propose to assume that is not the case and will not be in the near future. > >So, what say you all? Given that the realistic alternative is to do nothing at all, sure, why not? R's, John
- Re: [dbound] DBOUND and paths forward Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dbound] DBOUND and paths forward Gervase Markham
- Re: [dbound] DBOUND and paths forward Hodges, Jeff
- [dbound] DBOUND and paths forward Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dbound] DBOUND and paths forward John Levine
- Re: [dbound] DBOUND and paths forward HANSEN, TONY L
- Re: [dbound] DBOUND and paths forward Kurt Andersen
- Re: [dbound] DBOUND and paths forward Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dbound] DBOUND and paths forward Jiankang Yao
- Re: [dbound] DBOUND and paths forward Casey Deccio
- Re: [dbound] DBOUND and paths forward Murray S. Kucherawy