Re: [dbound] The Fate of DBOUND

"Jiankang Yao" <> Wed, 16 November 2016 08:10 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C105812965A for <>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:10:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.398
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id taAGXhwQNGVh for <>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:10:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944E9129671 for <>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:10:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from healthyao-PC (unknown []) by (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf0B5gHxyFCxYErA+Bw--.20284S2; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 16:10:28 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 16:10:27 +0800
From: "Jiankang Yao" <>
To: "Paul Hoffman" <>, dbound <>
References: <>, <>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart426261177132_=----"
X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf0B5gHxyFCxYErA+Bw--.20284S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoWrtw4rAFyrKr4UZw4xWw4DArb_yoWxtrg_C3 yvgFs3JrW7GanFgr1xCr4Yqr10grsY9F1fGw45GF45XryDZws7Xrnrtr9Igr1xG39rA345 W3Z7Z3yUJ347ujkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUbf8YjsxI4VWxJwAYFVCjjxCrM7AC8VAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l1xkIjI8I 6I8E6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM2 8CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW8JVW5JwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0 cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVWxJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26F4UJVW0owA2z4x0Y4vEx4 A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_GcCE3s1le2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG6xAIxVCF xsxG0wAv7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr1lOx8S6xCaFV Cjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JM4xvF2IEb7IF0Fy264kE64k0F24lFcxC0VAY jxAxZF0Ex2IqxwCY02Avz4vE14v_GFyl42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7 v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUGVWUWwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF 1VAY17CE14v26r1Y6r17MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIx AIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWrJr0_WFyU JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UMVCEFc xC0VAYjxAxZFUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU0bdbUUUUUU==
X-CM-SenderInfo: x1dryyw6fq0xffof0/
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [dbound] The Fate of DBOUND
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: yaojk <>
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 08:10:37 -0000

From: Paul Hoffman
Date: 2016-11-16 15:16
Subject: Re: [dbound] The Fate of DBOUND

>Proposal: the WG stays open, there is a near-immediate WG Last Call on 
>all three protocol documents in order to collect a last round of 
>editorial and technical (not design) comments, and then all three are 
>moved to Alexey for AD-sponsored as Experimental. That does include an 
>IETF Last Call and IESG review, but Alexey can cover that. (This is 
>assuming that Alexey is willing to do this.)

I generally agree with Paul's suggestion. 

is it possible to publish the draft above as the experimental one too?

Jiankang Yao